> If not (if the setting doesn't carry over) then you're seeing images at 100% within it and 125% everywhere else (like in the browser, and so on).
Yes, I've verified that is what is happening. If I switch the Windows setting for "Make text and other items larger or smaller" back to 100%, then the image displays as the same size in both the editor and the browser.
But at 100%, everything (icons, menus, etc.) is too small for my comfort, so I need to keep it at 125%.
I'm glad that the image editor still shows the image at the actual size, at least. I started wondering if there's a way to force the browser to ignore the 125% setting when rendering pages, but then I suppose the webpage text and navigation buttons would look too small. There's no way for the browser to know which images I want scaled, and which ones not.
The reason why this has bothered me when I post images, is that they always look nice and crisp in the image editor, but due to the scaling, they look less crisp / somewhat blurry in the browser. But I'm glad to know now that's due to my own settings, rather than DW changing the image somehow when displaying it.
no subject
Yes, I've verified that is what is happening. If I switch the Windows setting for "Make text and other items larger or smaller" back to 100%, then the image displays as the same size in both the editor and the browser.
But at 100%, everything (icons, menus, etc.) is too small for my comfort, so I need to keep it at 125%.
I'm glad that the image editor still shows the image at the actual size, at least. I started wondering if there's a way to force the browser to ignore the 125% setting when rendering pages, but then I suppose the webpage text and navigation buttons would look too small. There's no way for the browser to know which images I want scaled, and which ones not.
The reason why this has bothered me when I post images, is that they always look nice and crisp in the image editor, but due to the scaling, they look less crisp / somewhat blurry in the browser. But I'm glad to know now that's due to my own settings, rather than DW changing the image somehow when displaying it.