I was thinking about the pronoun thing some more today. When I first started reading Ancillary Justice, I kept thinking of all the characters as female because of it. I had to remind myself that they might be male once in a while. By now, I'm picturing (as in visually, how they look, and maybe how their voice sounds) most of the characters as rather androgynous.
I don't usually picture characters in great detail, unless a lot of detail is given in the book, but for some of them I do create a vague "sort of looks like" image in my mind, and that's what I'm talking about.
As to whether the pronouns affect how I think of the characters' mental state and personalities, and if it would be different if male pronouns were used instead, it's hard to say. Right now, the personalities seem rather androgynous to me too. ... Which seems natural, because if you take away appearances and gender cues, and simply deal with the mind, aren't most people androgynous? I'm not sure that's true, but it seems plausible to me. I don't really understand what people mean when they say they "feel male inside" or "feel female inside".
Normally when I read stories, I hear the people with female pronouns "speak" (in my mind) with a higher pitched voice, and they have a different mental "flavor" than the people with the male pronouns, who seem more the "default" people to me. These Ancillary books have been helpful in combating that a little bit for me, personally.
Tisarwat was described as originally having been "flighty". That's one adjective I have difficulty in thinking of as applying to a male person. I'm not sure why.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
chiming
no subject
Date: 2019-04-04 03:05 am (UTC)From:I don't usually picture characters in great detail, unless a lot of detail is given in the book, but for some of them I do create a vague "sort of looks like" image in my mind, and that's what I'm talking about.
As to whether the pronouns affect how I think of the characters' mental state and personalities, and if it would be different if male pronouns were used instead, it's hard to say. Right now, the personalities seem rather androgynous to me too. ... Which seems natural, because if you take away appearances and gender cues, and simply deal with the mind, aren't most people androgynous? I'm not sure that's true, but it seems plausible to me. I don't really understand what people mean when they say they "feel male inside" or "feel female inside".
Normally when I read stories, I hear the people with female pronouns "speak" (in my mind) with a higher pitched voice, and they have a different mental "flavor" than the people with the male pronouns, who seem more the "default" people to me. These Ancillary books have been helpful in combating that a little bit for me, personally.
Tisarwat was described as originally having been "flighty". That's one adjective I have difficulty in thinking of as applying to a male person. I'm not sure why.