darkoshi: (Default)
A while back, I heard this song somewhere and liked it; I added it to my "music to maybe get" list.

Today I finished reading the book "Amari and the Night Brothers", which I bought as a Christmas gift for my niece. (So I had to finish the book by tomorrow!) While reading, I listened to some of Cilmi's other music on YouTube.

When the video for "Sweet About Me" came on, after a while something in the video caught my eye and made me rewind it a bit. Then I had to rewatch it again from the very beginning. Not only do I like the song, but the video amuses me too!

So then I looked up the song lyrics and read more about the song.
I was surprised to find out:
- The song is way back from 2008; the video was posted in 2009.
- The singer was born in 1991 so was only about 17 years old at the time; she started working on the album when she was only 13 years old!
- The song was the most played song in the UK during 2009 and was a big hit in Europe.

That last point made me think this must be another one of those cases where I find something that seems neat and consider posting it, but then find out it was a massive hit some years ago, that everyone else probably already knows about.

But per the Wikipedia page, in the U.S. it only reached #99 on the Billboard's US Pop 100 chart. So many Americans may not have heard the song yet, at least.



Video title: Gabriella Cilmi - Sweet About Me (Official Video)
Posted by: Gabriella Cilmi
Date posted: Jun 26, 2009

Thump thump.

Monday, December 5th, 2016 12:47 am
darkoshi: (Default)
Genesis, Mama - this 1983 song played on the radio late one night when I must have been between 11 and 13 years old, and I taped it. It hinted at an alternate dark spooky world. Thump thump. Thump thump. (Don't break, don't break.) A part of the music spoke to me deeply, a part of it repelled me. I don't think I ever heard the song again on the radio, at least not *that* version. *That* version was something that could only play late at night, in the dark, found by chance while scrolling through stations on my radio.

The opening music before the vocals is simply awesome.

The lyrics didn't make much sense. Surely he couldn't be singing about his mother. I knew he must have been calling his girlfriend "Mama", but that still evoked an uncomfortable sense of incest to my mind. I had never heard anyone else call their girlfriend "Mama". The other part that repelled me was the crazy/evil laugh.

The line "It's getting so hard" meant only "It's getting so difficult", to my mind. The alternate sense only occurred to me today upon reading the lyrics. I wouldn't have understand that other sense back then. The "oh ooooooooooooh!!!" after the line was a perfect expression of pain/feeling/longing/suffering. (Shout, shout, let it all out, but that's another song.)

The Wikipedia page for the song has a quote from Phil Collins explaining what the lyrics are about.
"...and that's really what the song is about, with sinister overtones".

Sinister. Yes, that is the word. The laughter is definitely sinister.

dream

Friday, January 22nd, 2016 01:20 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I realized I had awoken. And I thought, "That was a dream? ... That was an Awesome Dream!!!"

I tried to remember it. The following was only the last bit of it. There was much more before, but that was too far gone already, to remember.

I was falling.
For an interminable time, as if I must surely smash into the ground and die.
(From a giant Tree? There had been another tree nearby, and someone Else who had suchly fallen and had felt great fear while falling, but they *had* hit the ground and died.)

Yet my falling kept being halted, and switching to weightlessness. Then falling again.

I was being played with, I realized. By a god. The god.
(I had the distinct feeling in the dream that the god was female gendered, and me male, but there was nothing otherwise gendered or sexual about the dream.)

So, knowing that this was a game and that She did not want me to die, only to be afraid, lightened my fears.

Eventually the Falling stopped.
Then the God beckoned, and I came - or maybe They pulled me - across galaxies and empty Space. I could see a set of ~7 galaxies, passing by. Then we stopped, having reached the destination (one of the galaxies?)

We were suddenly in a room, like an office (but I knew it was a jail cell).
The God was cutting a piece of pinkish ribbon (like for wrapping presents) in order to bind my wrists with it. A short piece. She was going to tape it closed.

I held my wrists out with my hands in loose fists, palms up. She indicated to turn them the other way, so I did. She must have tied them/taped them with the ribbon, as then she was writing in some Notebook of hers.

I watched/read as she wrote. It was some notes about me, and she was writing a Number at the top of the page. I realized it was a number to identify me, the prisoner, the specimen. It was a large number; like 16 thousand and something. I was one of that many prisoners of hers.

I became intensely sad, realizing that even if she came to visit me in this cell, that they would be short visits, with eternity in between.

But then I made my sadness be still and go away, for right now, she was here. I should appreciate/enjoy her Presence while I still could.

Around the time that I woke up, I was thinking about how easily I could break the ribbon binding my wrists, if it weren't that doing so would bring Her wrath. Who would dare to invoke her wrath? Or maybe the light binding was so I could free myself if other Danger came. Or maybe the ribbon would shortly transform into thick steel.

greys

Wednesday, February 18th, 2015 01:25 am
darkoshi: (Default)
There's a "new trailer" on YouTube for The Secretary (movie). It seems like a good marketing idea to me, taking advantage of the current 50 Shades hype... Hah! I didn't realize the characters in both were named Mr. Grey!

odd dream

Saturday, November 9th, 2013 01:50 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I was outside with someone else, apparently having trimmed / cut back overgrowth. The other person mentioned that this one plant that had been trimmed was an oracle.

There was a question/mystery we needed answered. So I addressed the plant, "Oh, Oracle Plant, ..."

Immediately, a vine on the plant grew outwards, and wrapped itself around my wrists. It may have also wrapped one around my neck. But it wasn't menacing; it was recognizing me as a supplicant.

storytime!

Saturday, January 26th, 2013 10:55 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
Here is a little BDSM story I wrote, titled "The Question".

(It's not at all long, truly! But it might be slightly NSFW.)
darkoshi: (Default)
Uncensored version of 30 Seconds to Mars' music video "Hurricane".

It has a lot of S/M scenes. Don't wait for any of it to start making sense; it won't. As it says at the beginning, "This is a dream". The video as a whole doesn't appeal to me, but the imagery is well done and some parts are quite pretty.

In terms of my kink and sexuality, none of the scenes in the video are a turn-on for me. The scantily clad, bound, passive or sexually engaged females in the video are all a big turn-off for me. Of the remaining females, I find the winged/feather type person very artistically/aesthetically intriguing/pleasing, and the 2 twins somewhat so. The blond male is cute (I'd like to have a body like his) and has nice pants. Naturally (sarcasm intended), the males in the video are depicted doing active things like jumping out of windows and fighting each other for no apparent reason. The only purpose of the single female with non-sexual action scenes seems to be to deceive and trick one of the guys.

It seems a natural reaction for me to even more strongly dis-identify with being female, when exposed to this kind of stuff. I wonder if it affects cis-gendered females in the same way or not.

erotica

Monday, October 11th, 2010 10:45 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
[video no longer available at original location]

Music: "Your Master" by Infekktion

Another version of the video (more color, less contrast) here.

(no subject)

Saturday, May 23rd, 2009 08:30 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I don't know yet how to go about either getting top surgery or getting on antidepressants. The latter seems simpler - look up psychologists in my health insurance directory, and choose one. The former involves more research and deciding if I really want to go ahead with it, and finding out if I can even get it done. But I wonder if I get on antidepressants, if that could make it harder to get top surgery. Maybe a doctor would think that me being on psych meds was a sign of mental instability. It's probably hard enough convincing a doctor that I want my breasts removed even though I don't plan on presenting as male.

I just noticed that Bro and Pard chipped the inside finish on one of my enamel pots. It shouldn't bother me; it's just a pot. Friends and family are more important than pots, right? It seems like I should appreciate having them here more than I do; it seems like I should enjoy their company and their presence, and not just always be finding fault with things.


I read this post earlier. At first, I thought, "Aw, that's sweet, someone in love". But then I got to thinking, that I've never really felt that way about anyone - being in love and missing the other person's physical presence. I even find it hard to imagine. The closest thing I can think of is when I had my first crush (as well as the 2nd), and I missed being able to communicate/interact with that person when he wasn't online and when he did not respond to my emails in a timely manner. I suppose that if we had been having a lot of physical interactions that were as exciting as the online interactions, that then I might have also missed his physical presence.

I missed Q's online presence too, at times, in the beginning. Now we don't interact online anymore... I still miss that somewhat, when I think about it. There's something I get, when chatting online with someone, that I don't get in their physical presence. I suppose that must seem odd to other people. Or maybe it's just the sexual tension that used to be there, which isn't anymore. Maybe that is what I miss, and even if we chatted online now, it would not be the same as it was back then.

I don't miss Q on the days he's not here... I know he's coming back in a day or two, so what is there to miss? I only get sad and think about missing him, when I think about us breaking up. Because then he wouldn't be back, ever.

I get to feeling sorry for myself when I think about such things. Poor me, I don't like anyone enough to miss them. Poor me, there's no sexual tension in my life. Poor me, I've lost the capability to feel sexual tension. Poor ole me.

I had a sexual dream last night. It involved rubber sandals. Q was in a part of it. It wasn't a particularly memorable or special dream, but I was feeling subby in it. And oddly, it also included a woman from work whom I'm not in the least attracted to when I'm awake. In the dream, she was acting domly towards me.

This whole BDSM thing is an unresolved issue with me. I feel bitter and disappointed when I think about BDSM. I can't have sexual tension without D/s. But I don't want to submit to anyone. Because when I do, nothing good comes of it.

Poor ole me. Blah, blah, blah.

(no subject)

Wednesday, January 23rd, 2008 10:30 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
Unless I change my mind again, I've decided to vote for Edwards in the primary. Posting this here is as much to remind me of my decision as anything else.

.

Forestfen apparently still has the notion that BDSMers are "devil-worshippers". I asked her, "If I don't believe in God, what makes you think I believe in the Devil?" She seemed surprised when I said of the people in my group, "They're all darn Christians too."

.

While making a purchase at the auto parts store, the way one of the employees behaved in relation to another person that walked into the store seemed remarkably ...shady... to me. Gave me the uncomfortable feeling that the employees were involved in something illegal.

.

I'm looking into whether to get a tankless water heater. It may end up depending on the installation costs relative to a "standard" tank heater. One of the Bosch gas tankless models uses "hydrogenerated ignition". The idea of using water to create a flame seems amazing to me:
"Hydro-generated ignition works much like the giant turbines in a hydroelectric dam using the flow of water to generate electricity. When a hot water tap is opened, cold water flows through the 1600's hydro generator. The flowing water spins a tiny turbine, which, in turn, instantly produces electricity. This electricity creates the spark required to light the burners and the water is then heated as it passes through a copper heat exchanger."

.

Time for bed. Past time.

(no subject)

Sunday, November 18th, 2007 11:38 am
darkoshi: (Default)
I sound like what in Japanese?

"Grammar and syntax aside, Japanese men generally speak in shortened huffs, while women tend to speak in artificially high octaves, elongating their word endings in an almost coquettish attempt to flatter the listener."

Shortened huffs certainly describes how men speak in old Japanese movies. That's one thing I don't like about watching some of those movies... the characters seem grim and serious, and it sounds to me as if they are shouting at each other throughout the whole movie. That can leave me feeling stressed. In one movie I was watching, I was amused that the men kept uttering what sounded like short trembling groans, but the subtitles were translating it as "Yes, Sir". I thought it would be funny if at future BDSM group meetings, the subs were to utter short groans like that in place of saying "Yes, Sir".

I don't like that there are cultural associations of short, gruff, monotonic, non-emotional or angry-sounding speech with masculinity. Although that does give people who want to down-play their masculinity a relatively simple way of doing it - by speaking differently. Which is the reason perhaps, of why some gay men tend to speak differently from straight men, even in English.

I think I tend to be short/monotonic myself, when I speak. It's not something I do purposefully/consciously in order to sound masculine, though. It seems to me to take more mental and physical effort to use expressive intonations/inflections. And it seems fake, somehow... like an actor reading their lines as opposed to someone speaking straight from their heart. It's hard enough verbalizing the things I want to say, without adding extra inflections on top too. For example, if I compose and write down a few sentences to use as my answering machine message, I can then add extra intonations to it when recording it. But it is hard to do that in regular conversation.

So perhaps one's method of speech may be related to how one's brain has developed. Perhaps males in general would tend to speak differently than females, even without cultural/social influences.

While reading the above article, I wondered why speaking in a high-pitched voice would be interpreted as a form of flattery. But if it is a woman speaking to a man, maybe it is because that makes it sound as if the woman finds the guy attractive, and is excited to be speaking to him, like a teenage girl who has a crush on a boy. Which begs the question, do Japanese women also use a high-pitched voice when speaking to each other? But then I suppose a woman could be happy and excited to be speaking to another woman too... it would give the impression she thinks highly of her, which is what flattery is all about.

Come to think of it, when someone says "Hi" in a long drawn-out, high-pitched voice, that does give the impression that they are happy to see you (in person) or to be speaking with you (on the phone).

(no subject)

Tuesday, October 23rd, 2007 07:11 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I responded to a thread on masochism in one of my groups, and about whether one can really experience pleasure and suffering at the same time, by citing some examples of where one can feel conflicting things at the same time. Such as....

One's head may be burning with a fever, yet one can feel chilled
at the same time. Or one can eat hot chili, and wince from
the spiciness, yet enjoy the flavor and/or the knowledge
that one is "tough" enough to handle the heat. Or one can be
outside in the winter, and shivering from extreme cold,
while enjoying the scenery.

Sometimes, whether one interprets something as mainly pleasurable or a form of suffering may depend on what one's mind is more focused on. Or on which stimuli seems more prominent.

So maybe that's all there is to it. That to me, the unpleasantness of overt D/s has outweighed the pleasantness of it, at least with the people I've interacted with so far. And in one case, the unpleasantness of a different aspect of the relationship outweighed the pleasantness of the D/s aspect.

(no subject)

Saturday, August 4th, 2007 11:49 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I am unhappy.
I don't know what I want.
I can't think of anything I would want.

I don't know what would make me feel good.
I can think of things that would make me feel bad, but not good.

I don't think BDSM can make me feel good anymore.
Does that imply it made me feel good in the past?

Short little spikes of feeling good.

But I don't think it can do that anymore.

My mind can't create the good feeling.

I went for a walk in Georgia once.
And scratched my sign by a trickle of water.

I went for a walk in Massachusetts,
and cried in the rain.
Or was it snow?

I went for a walk in the desert once,
but it is gone.

I don't feel about this
like I feel I should feel.

I don't like penises and scrotums and vulvas.
I still don't like them.

Maybe tonight I'll dream
a wonderful feeling.

(no subject)

Saturday, March 10th, 2007 09:07 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I've decided that the label "submissive" really doesn't fit me well. Rather, I'm a bottom with some submissive tendencies who enjoys psychological D/s play. Not as easy to say, but... better descriptive.

I don't want D/s to be the basis or crux of a relationship. I want friendship, partnership, companionship, and affection to be the basis. But I like D/s as play, as something fun, something which affects me strongly and makes me feel good. I believe I even need it, to enjoy a relationship. When I say "play", I don't mean it can't be serious, and significant, and even painful at times. But I don't see myself as being constantly submissive. As part of the play, I might even want to act rebellious sometimes. But sometimes, I might not want to play at all.

I don't want someone who will treat me like a sub all the time, but I do want someone who might treat me like a sub at any time.

.

I want to be loved for who I am.

When I close my eyes at night, I want to feel sheltered by someone's concern and affection for me.

When I wake, I want to feel that the care & concern & affection is real and tangible, not just something I pretended/invented in order to fall comfortably asleep.

I want to love someone for who they are, not just for the affection they show me.

I want someone who can inspire that wonderfully euphoric feeling in me that has something to do with D/s.

I want someone with whom I can feel comforted by their physical touch and presence at least as often as I resort to comforting myself by thinking about it when I am alone.

In other words, I want to spend more time with my partner, than I spend yearning to be with them. But I guess there would need to be some times of yearning, in order for me to recognize how much they mean to me.

.

I was trying to think of the word to describe a particular relationship, like between my master/soulmate and me in one of my fantasies. The kind of relationship where the one has power over the other... in the fantasy, it was absolute power - life & death; power to read my thoughts and emotions; etc. In real life, I guess it could be a lesser power... But where, like in the fantasy, the other person can look at me (straight through me) in a way that makes my insides drop... makes me lose balance, feeling that power of theirs over me. A wonderful feeling of belonging, of fear, of excitement, of acknowledging their power over me.

I can't think of the word for describing that particular kind of relationship.
Disciple, no. Minion, no. Dominant/submissive, not necessarily. Master/slave, no.
Master/something... maybe. Master/pupil, not necessarily.

When I was young, I used to envision master/apprentice relationships as that kind of relationship. I had read books about apprentices where the master even had the power to have the apprentice put to death, if they were displeased enough with them. And then there was Star Wars, where Darth Vader was the Emperor's apprentice... oh, that was so cool.
But nowadays, the term apprentice just means to me someone who is being taught things. It doesn't so much imply the master having power over the student.

And for the relationship I'm trying to think of the word for, the "master" wouldn't necessarily even have to be teaching the other person anything. It wouldn't even need to be a consensual power-exchange relationship, just one where the one person has some kind of significant power over the other. Such as a captor and captive. It seems like there should be some word for that. Maybe it will come to me.
darkoshi: (Default)
Having a Dom want me to do those things seems similar to a Dom/me wanting their transsexual MTF submissive to get her hair cut in a short men's style, and to wear men's clothing, and to present as male. While on the one hand, it can seem a great act of submission for the sub to go along with this just to please the Dom/me, it's also obviously going to make the sub feel that the Dom/me doesn't respect their true gender, and actually views them as the other gender, and would really prefer them to be that other gender, instead of who they actually are.

It would also be similar to a Dom/me wanting their non-transgendered male submissive to grow his hair long and to wear women's clothing, or for a Dom/me wanting their non-transgendered female submissive to cut her hair short and to wear men's clothing. Except that in these cases, the sub's physical sex would still probably be quite apparent for most observers, so perhaps the sub wouldn't feel quite as strongly that their own gender, which matches their physical sex, was being hidden/buried. But it would be just as emotionally discomforting for them, and perhaps even more so than for me (since my own gender-id is between that of a man and woman, whereas for them, it would be on the other end of what they were being made to present as).

Submissive females (or bottoms) often have a limit that the Dom can't cut off their hair. At least, I believe I have heard a few people stating that as a limit of theirs. Their hairstyle is a part of their identity. They would feel less feminine and less attractive with short hair. That is the same kind of reasoning as my own gender-related limits (even though for them, they would most likely still be seen as female, even with short hair - so their actual gender would not be in question). So why should these limits of mine be seen as unreasonable, or as a sign that I am not really submissive?

Other than the first Dom I was involved with, no one else has explicitly said that, but that is the feeling I get, of how other people view (or would view) those limits of mine. Which perhaps just means that I feel that hardly anyone truly understands my gender identity.

I feel that the 2nd Dom whom I was (briefly) involved with, understood my gender best. He seemed to treat my gender-id as a positive thing... he took to calling me "boy" (which I was very tickled by)... he even asked if I preferred "boy" or "boi"... he even asked what pronouns I preferred, and he actually used them when referring to me while chatting with someone else! He even seemed to understand that one of my issues with not wanting to gain any weight (in spite of telling me that it would still be wise for me to do so) was because it would make me look more feminine.
darkoshi: (Default)
So far, my list of BDSM limits has included no shaving of my armpits or legs.

From one perspective, having to shave my legs shouldn't really be such a big deal. I've never done it before, but I suppose I could learn, and it shouldn't really make much difference even though I'd no longer have my cute and precious never-before-shorn little leghairs. And even though I'd probably feel less good-looking with shaved stubble and bald legs.

The same thing could be said about shaving my armpits, although I do have another concern there. My armpit skin is sensitive, and I sometimes get a rash. When that happens, use of deodorant causes burning, itching, and further redness. It is inconvenient not being able to apply deodorant until the rash goes away. My concern is that shaving would cause me to get such rashes more often. But still, having no hairs in my armpits shouldn't be a big deal in general.

From a different perspective however, not shaving is an aspect of my gender identity. It is significant to me. I've never shaved those parts of my body. I am proud of having been able to express my gender identity by not following the female "norm" for this. Women usually shave those parts of their bodies; men usually don't. It never made sense to me as to why females should have to shave those parts, while men didn't. I am glad not to have been brainwashed into thinking that there's something bad about having these cute little hairs on my body.

Since I have a regular female body, when I am naked, this is one of the few things that distinguishes me from most other adult females. (Having unpierced ears is another). If I were to shave my legs and armpits like other women do, I'd look just like them. It would bother me. I'd feel that I had succumbed to the fallacious notion that females need to shave in order to be pretty. Or that I'd been forced into the negative role of playing the part of one of those women, just to please someone else.

Having a Dom want me to shave those parts of my body would also bother me, because it would tend to make me feel that he really did not understand my gender identity, and that he really viewed me as just another woman. I would feel that he were trying to transform me into the stereotypical sexual ideal of how a woman should look, even though I am not a woman but rather an androgyne. I would feel that he did not understand me, or truly respect me, or like me as I am and for who I am.

I do not have the same issues with shaving my pubic hair. That is not currently a limit. I've never done it before, but it is not something that I feel is connected to my gender identity. Shaving that part of my body, while not something I desire to do, would not bother me in the same way. Likewise, having my head shaved would not bother me either.

Another limit of mine is that a Dom will not have control over my hairstyle or hairlength. My hairstyle is also partially an aspect of my gender identity. It is not as significant to me as the shaving of legs and armpits, but having a very short hairstyle is another way of visibly distinguishing myself from most other females. In my first relationship with a Dom, I was not allowed to cut my hair. This ended up being a sore point for me, when the relationship was no longer satisfying me. I was annoyed at not being allowed to cut my hair, when I didn't even seem to be getting anything good out of the relationship. I was also upset by the thought that he preferred me to look like (and by inference, to be like) a typical woman. It wasn't just a temporary annoyance; in hot weather I often feel like cutting my hair short, so it was an ongoing thing, until I eventually rebelled.

In order to avoid another such scenario, I decided to make that a future limit. I didn't want not being allowed to cut my hair to become a sore point between another Dom and me. I am not sure whether this limit is truly reasonable or not. It seems that most Doms want their subs to have long hair. And I certainly do like having long enough hair on my head for a Dom to grab. But I also like having very short hair. Not just because of gender, but because it is comfortable and easy to care for. The past year or two, I've compromised with myself - having long hair in one part for a ponytail, but cutting it short elsewhere.

Clothing is another aspect of my gender identity. When the first Dom I was involved with told me that I'd be required to wear a skirt and/or dress for him, it initially upset me very much. I eventually decided that I would submit to a Dom (or that Dom, anyway) telling me what to wear when I was in his presence, but not otherwise. I likened it to wearing a costume... wearing a costume for someone shouldn't be a problem, if that's what they wanted. However, in general, having a Dom wanting me to dress in a feminine fashion would still bother me, for similar reasons as with them wanting me to shave. With clothing, it is not just an issue of how the Dom views me or how I view myself, but also of how other people view me. If I were out in public wearing feminine clothing, it would bother me that other people would see me as a regular woman, as opposed to my normal androgyne self / my real self.

(no subject)

Wednesday, February 14th, 2007 10:29 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
Thoughts from a few days ago... and which I want to think some more about when I have time.

.

When I think of a relationship between a Top and a bottom, I think of it as a series of temporary scenes. In between scenes, they are equals, and there is no D/s between them. I generally think of the scenes themselves as being mainly physical play, as opposed to containing D/s elements, although I suppose there could be the latter as well. And I think of each scene as being mutually consented to before-hand. If either party is not in the mood for it, then the scene simply does not happen.

When I think of a relationship between a Dom and a sub (assuming that they are in a D/s relationship with each other), I think of it as a 24/7 thing. Once the sub agrees to the relationship, it implies consent to any "scene" the Dom wants to initiate, as long as no limits are broken. Basically, any time the Dom tells the sub to do something, or any time the sub does an assigned task, it could be considered a "scene" from my viewpoint. The sub is not asked first if they feel like partaking in a scene or not; it just happens.

The idea of having a Dom, and having the Dom always being in charge, is erotic for me. But could I find that erotic in real life, or is it something that's only erotic to fantasize about? It wouldn't really be erotic, if I weren't in the mood for it, or would it? And it wouldn't really be erotic, if the Dom were wanting me to do things which I have issues with (and there are so many things which I have issues with), would it? Or, it might be somewhat erotic in the beginning, but it couldn't stay erotic for long, could it?

Would it be possible to have a D/s relationship, and have it not be 24/7, but rather more like a Top/bottom relationship - a series of temporary scenes? In between scenes, the Dom and sub would treat each other as equals. Could a relationship like that be erotic for me, or would I not be able to get into a D/s headspace with someone, if I had that much control - always being able to say yes or no to each scene?

If I could choose whether or not to agree to each scene, then there would be no reason for me to agree to scenes which I did not think I would enjoy. Even if I did agree to such scenes, they would not be erotic for me, simply because I willingly chose to do them; there would be no feeling of being controlled; no feeling of being under the Dom's control, of being subject to the Dom's whims and desires.

So even for any scenes which weren't otherwise objectionable, and which I did agree to, I don't think I would have the right mindset for me to enjoy the D/s interactions. I would not feel subby. It would not feel erotic.

For me to be in a successful 24/7 D/s relationship with a Dom, we would need to be well-matched.

- The Dom would need to seem worthy enough of my respect. We would need to have similar (or compatible) views on key issues - political, religious, philosophical, etc. - for me to *want* to be their sub; for me *not* to feel conflicted about choosing to submit to them in an ongoing basis.

- The Dom would need to not tell me to do things which I dislike or am uncomfortable with, too often. Because eventually, whenever I was not in the mood, these things would not be erotic for me, and would be unpleasant and make me question the relationship and why I was putting up with it.

- Yet there would need to be some cases where the Dom had me do things which I was uncomfortable with, or disliked. Because otherwise, I would not really feel that they were in control of me. And the relationship would no longer seem as erotic for me.

As a sub, for me to feel good in a D/s relationship, I need to...
- have respect for the Dom
- feel a good chemistry between us
- not feel despondent about the future
- be in the mood for it ??
darkoshi: (Default)
Nylon whips! I haven't encountered any non-leather whips before now, so hadn't given much thought to the possibility of anyone engaging in whip-play with me. But now, ooh, the possibilities! I wish I could play with one... I wanna make loud cracking noises. ::pout::

(no subject)

Saturday, February 10th, 2007 01:54 am
darkoshi: (Default)
Here's an old post I was searching back for. A bit over 3 years ago. I've come pretty far since then. I suppose, anyway. Not really any more optimistic than I used to be. But at least then I had a vague idea what I was seeking - "exploration of nonsexual BDSM experiences".
Now, I don't know anymore. Or maybe I'm just in a funk, right? Yeah. Funkydelic.

Oh yes, and speaking of years, I was counting them today, and...
I've been a vegetarian for 19 and a half years. Vegan for 19 years. Whew.

April 2025

S M T W T F S
  12345
6 789101112
13141516 17 1819
2021 2223242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Wednesday, April 23rd, 2025 04:03 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios