LLMs improvement

[darkoshi]

It is really amazing how good some of these LLMs are, especially with programming topics. But also in understanding your question (even complicated ones) and responding with relevant responses. If you've tried them out a while back and been disappointed, you may want to try them out again to see how improved they are. Just sayin'.

If the first answer(s) you get aren't right or aren't what you wanted, reply to the LLM saying so, and it will probably give you a better answer on the next try.

As to where to find which LLM for testing, I'm no expert on that. I use the Copilot icon in the Edge browser to get to Copilot. I have some other links saved elsewhere for chatGpt, etc. Today was the first time I tried the gpt4o-mini AI via DuckDuckGo's anonymized interface - it had others available to choose from too.

Comments

[darkoshi]

I've generated some images with Bing Image Creator, and with Google Gemini earlier this year. They require logging in with an account - don't know if that bothers you - but were free when I used them. I wasn't trying to generate very specific images, but some of the results pleased me. I didn't like not being able to tell it to tweak the images in such and such a way.... I think one of them had some functionality for that but it didn't work well if I recall right. That's probably improved a lot by now, but may be a paid feature.

I think the LLMs that can generate good images matching your prompts are out there, but maybe not free. Then again, I haven't tried looking into it lately.