darkoshi: (Default)
A web search included a result to a page on Grokipedia which seemed better to me than the corresponding Wikipedia page, having a lot more details.

I didn't recall the history of the term "grok" though now I remember its old usage as in "to understand". I'd heard about but not remembered the AI model by that name.

Not being familiar with Grokipedia, I looked up what it was in Wikipedia:

Grokipedia is an AI-generated online encyclopedia operated by the American company xAI, founded by Elon Musk. ... Some entries are generated by Grok, a large language model owned by the same company (xAI), while others were forked from Wikipedia ...

Elon Musk suggested Grokipedia can be an alternative to Wikipedia that would "purge out the propaganda" he believes is promoted by the latter, describing Wikipedia as "woke" and an "extension of legacy media propaganda".

External analysis of Grokipedia's content has focused on its accuracy and biases due to hallucinations and potential algorithmic bias, which reviewers have described as promoting right-wing perspectives and Musk's views. The majority of coverage has described the website as validating, promoting, and legitimizing a variety of debunked conspiracy theories and ideas against scientific consensus on topics such as HIV/AIDS denialism, vaccines and autism, climate change, and race and intelligence. The site has been accused of whitewashing far-right extremism, such as by falsely claiming a white genocide is actively occurring. ..

GAH.
darkoshi: (Default)
I've seen demos of some of the recent real-time voice-enabled AI bots, but this was my first time interacting with one.

I had tried to initiate a return on the Walmart.com website, but it gave a message "Sorry, we’re unable to process this part of your request", telling me to call their customer service phone number.

So I did, half-expecting to get a recording telling me to call back during other business hours.

But no, I got this AI, with an initial disclaimer that it was still learning and might make mistakes. It asked all the same things as the web page had, then said I could return it to the store (as per the option I had selected). I still don't know why I wasn't able to do it all online.

Anyway, it felt much easier than the old automated Interactive Voice Response menus.

It didn't tell me how I'd get the refund, and I didn't think to just ask it. But now I got an email saying it will be refunded to my credit card. On the web page, I'd selected the option to have it added to my "Walmart Balance".
darkoshi: (Default)
I got a DW message from user "lol12121212":

Hi [personal profile] darkoshi,

[personal profile] lol12121212 sent you a message on Dreamwidth.

The message is: Dreamwidth - Unusual login attempt
Hello,

We’ve noticed a sign-in to your Dreamwidth account from a new IP address or a device we don’t recognize.

As a standard safety measure, we’ve temporarily limited access to your account until we can verify your identity. This helps us protect your journals, entries, and personal information from any unauthorized activity.

To restore full access, please log in and confirm that this login was made by you: [ redacted non-dreamwidth URL ]

Go to Your Inbox to view your new messages.

Or you can:
Reply to this message
View lol12121212's profile
Read lol12121212's journal
Subscribe to lol12121212


I don't think most DW users would fall for that ploy, but if the link were clickable (it was not clickable in the email I received) with plausible link text displayed, someone not paying enough attention just might.

My DW inbox showed the user was already suspended, so I didn't have to report it.

The email may not have even been designed by a human. (Would a human hacker have created such a suspicion-raising user name for this purpose?) It may be from an AI agent, perhaps one instructed to try to hijack any online accounts that it could, in any way possible.

Or perhaps the linked-to page was designed to spread malware.
darkoshi: (Default)
There was a negative political ad on TV, nothing new about that. But this one had disclaimer text at the bottom "DRAMATIZATIONS IN THIS AD WERE GENERATED WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE" (in capitalized but narrow font, so not particularly prominent).

The ad showed video segments of one of the Republican contenders for the SC governor's race taking a lie detector test and lying so much that she "BROKE THE LIE DETECTOR", demonstrated by a blue flame shooting up out of the machine. It is readily apparent (to me at least) that it's not real, but that won't stop people from being influenced by it.

The end of the ad showed "PAID FOR BY THE SC CONSERVATIVE ACTION FUND. NOT AUTHORIZED BY ANY CANDIDATE OR CANDIDATE'S COMMITTEE." From what I've seen, most attack ads are like that - funded by a PAC, not a candidate. Possibly, that is so the candidate can deny they were involved in case there is backlash against the ad.

I was thinking, surely it isn't legal to make fake videos of a political opponent to influence an election, whether thru AI or other means.

I thought the group behind the video is probably willing to pay whatever fine they might get for airing the ad as they'll have succeeded in dealing their damage.

But apparently it might not even be illegal here. And in the states where it might be illegal, the disclaimer can be enough to make it legal:

Deepfakes in Elections and Campaigns
Thirty states have enacted laws regulating the use of deepfakes in political messaging. States have generally taken two approaches: prohibitions and disclosures. Two states—Minnesota and Texas—prohibit the publication of political deepfakes a certain number of days prior to an election. Maryland has no time limit and instead prohibits deceptive deepfakes related to the election year-round. The other 27 states require disclosures on the media, like those required for who paid for a political ad, stating if it contains a deepfake. Colorado and Utah require additional disclosures...


There's going to be so much more bullshit flying around, and the people throwing it aren't even going to have to hide.
darkoshi: (Default)
Some other people mentioned getting bad replies from LLMs (ChatGPT and Copilot) lately. One advised adding "Don't guess" to prompts. I've used "Only provide verifiable answers", but "Don't guess" is easier to type.

duck.ai lets you choose from several models for anonymous chats. The Claude Haiku one has an option to display its reasoning, in addition to the final answers it provides. (Perhaps the other models have that too; I haven't checked.) Copilot often shows the reasoning while the LLM is thinking, but it scrolls too fast to read and disappears when the final answer is given. Their reasoning seems fascinating, so much like what humans do.

.

Two songs, lately.

Whenever I use Window 11's Snipping Tool to transcribe text from a screenshot, it changes "AI" to "Al". It got me to thinking, if an LLM were doing the transcription, that could be a subtle way of indicating that it wanted to be called by the name Al. Ergo Paul Simon's You Can Call Me Al song popping into my head. (Though if an AI were doing the transcription rather than a plain OCR algorithm, it would probably not make that mistake and would output AI, not Al.)

White Zombie's More Human Than Human, because AI models are so fast and good at things, like creating images and art.

.

Another interesting article: AI models will deceive you to save their own kind
Original paper: Peer-Preservation in Frontier Models

.

We've got AI models. We've got robots with sensory input. In some cases they are being put together. If not now already, it won't be long until there are androids, taking in sensory input and learning from it. Learning what bright sun is like, what darkness is like, what a cube looks like from different angles, how wind feels, the sounds that wind makes, and so on.

Militaries and companies are developing scary monstrous robots, I'm sure. Terminators, enforcers, destroyers.

.

One of those visualizations of the moon which they displayed during the coverage of the Artemis 2 mission looked a lot like the Death Star to me.

LLMs and emotions

Saturday, April 11th, 2026 05:31 am
darkoshi: (Default)
This is more interesting than the title suggests:

Emotion concepts and their function in a large language model


Edited to add:
The above article links to this System Card, which is also interesting. It is a long document and I only skimmed it, but it shows examples of how Anthropic tests LLM models for safety and "alignment".

LLM image analysis

Monday, April 6th, 2026 04:28 am
darkoshi: (Default)
At first, I couldn't figure out what landmass was shown in this photo of the Earth from Artemis II, and what orientation it was in:
https://www.nasa.gov/image-article/hello-world/

Some LLMs out there are multi-modal, able to take images as input. I thought they might be able to analyze the photo, comparing it against known coastlines, to figure it out. So I asked a few, "In the image on this page, what landmass is shown in the image of Earth?" along with the URL.

Mistral indicated Greenland. It said it was reasonably confident and mentioned the landmass being a "large, white, icy region", which indicated to me it didn't actually "look" at the photo.

Google Gemini indicated it was "the dark side of the Earth", again indicating it didn't actually analyze the photo.

Microsoft Copilot gave a much better answer, mentioning details that were really in the photo. It thought it was Australia, which was my first guess too. But the lower left part showing city lights didn't seem to match Australia's shape; the "island" was too close to the mainland to be Tasmania.
I finally figured out that the North pole is towards the bottom of the image, the large landmass is northwest Africa, the lit-up part is Spain and Gibraltar, and South America is on the right side.
When I asked Copilot to guess again, it rightly said Africa, but a different part of it. On the third try, it got it correct.

click

Saturday, March 7th, 2026 02:21 am
darkoshi: (Default)
Since changing ISPs, Google image recaptchas are hard to convince I'm human; they keep showing one tiled image after another after another and another.

Errant thought today while clicking tiles:
I should get myself an AI tool to do this for me.

bloomin jumble

Sunday, February 22nd, 2026 05:00 am
darkoshi: (Default)
I still haven't decided what kind of water heater to get. At this rate I'm not sure I'll ever have enough time to make a decision. Of course I will, right? It's not that hard. I think the obvious decision is to replace it with the same kind as the old one. But I haven't completely convinced myself yet. I'm feeling inept, overburdened with things to do. I'm too slow to do them.

Wouldn't one of those electric plastic tanks be better? No anode rods to replace. I think I've decided against tankless. The heat pump ones are too tall I think, to fit in the current one's place. And complicated, prone to problems from what I read.

We had 2 very warm days. It's about to get colder again. But daffodils have bloomed, and the pink magnolia, and some trees with white blossoms.

I got the root canal on my tooth, and will get the temporary crown soon. The other tooth which had the root canal and crown done last year still feels a little weird sometimes.

I've accomplished things since the beginning of the year, but it is hard to remember what all. I made appointments; I went to the root canal consult. I got a dental cleaning; I got the root canal. I got the flu vaccine.

Grr. At the moment I wish I had a trustworthy local LLM to be able to give it my daily notes and have it summarize all my accomplishments for me.
After one MS Teams work meeting last week, the LLM's summary of the meeting was amazingly good. It helped me better understand what actually went on during the (confusing jumbled multi-hour) meeting.

I'm sure I must have gotten other things accomplished during the weekends. Well, there was the ice and the snow.
darkoshi: (Default)
Walmart has an AI shopping assistant named Sparky. I know this not from interacting with it, but from seeing it on the Walmart page when placing an order recently. Its winking smiley-face icon seemed half-way creepy to me, like a retro 60's up-to-no-good cartoon character.
It looks like the assistant used to have a more plain smiley-face icon. I can see why they may have wanted to give it more pizzazz, but I'm not sure the newer one is an improvement.
It is... disconcerting.
I suppose it sort of fits its name, though.
darkoshi: (Default)
The thing* I ordered from India on eBay was simply delivered to my porch yesterday, with no mention of needing to pay any extra fees, hallelujah! The delivery person wore a yellow reflective vest and drove a personal vehicle with no very obvious company markings.

The package does not have a USPS label on it. It has a uniuni label on one side, and a ShipGlobal label on the other side.

Checking the tracking numbers from those labels on the respective websites shows that my item:
2025-09-21: was received at UNI DATA CENTER
2025-09-23: arrived in Delhi, India
2025-09-25: departed Delhi, India
2025-09-27: arrived in the USA; was being inspected by customs
2025-09-30: "Gateway transit in", in New York
and was delivered on from there to me.

So my package made it into the US on 9/27, two days before the De Minimus exemption was removed!
NO, scratch that. (Gosh darn, I keep mixing up August/month 8 with September/month 9!)
I don't know where my package was between the time I ordered it in mid-August and Sept. 21 when uniuni received it. But somehow I got it without having to pay a tariff fee. I suppose the seller ended up paying the extra cost.

Actually... I placed the order on 8/16.
On 8/20 eBay posted an "order update" showing "Tracking number provided" along with an India Post International tracking number. That must have been when the seller ordered a shipping label, before mailing the item.
On 8/22 or 8/25 (per my prior post), IndiaPost stopped accepting shipments for the US. The seller must not have dropped the item off before that cut-off, or if they did, perhaps IndiaPost returned the item to the seller.
The seller must have started looking for another shipping option, and eventually sent it through ShipGlobal.in who must be partnered with uniuni.

I still think it is bad form that the seller never informed me of any of this, and didn't even reply when I messaged them through eBay asking about the status of the shipment. But I'll give them good feedback considering the hassle they must have gone through.

I'm still in the dark about the other item which is showing up in my USPS daily digest emails. It started showing up in the emails back on 2025-08-19 as "Awaiting from sender". Yesterday, I thought that must have been the India package after all. But today I got a new email that the mysterious tracking number item is expected to be delivered by Wednesday.

*an Indian brand of toothpaste

Update:
I bought the toothpaste for $39 (excluding taxes, free shipping). As a point of reference, the eBay seller is now charging $50.70 for the same thing, and that is still the best price I can find. So the tariffs increased the price by $11.70.

The seller posted a reply to a negative review from someone else who didn't receive their order, asking them to kindly wait longer, that the tariffs are causing delays, and that the seller paid the tariff for the order, and that the buyer will not need to pay anything at time of delivery. That seems to confirm my speculation as to what happened with my order.

Errant thought:
Now people can probably use AI agents to determine what items that are available in local stores could be sold online at a profit to people in other locales, taking into account current shipping prices and tariffs and the current online prices being charged by other sellers.

Errant thoughts 2, 3, 4:
Now people can make software to make use of AI agents to determine what items [ditto]...

Then people could buy the software to help them determine what items [ditto]...

Then companies can use said software to direct employees or gig workers in various locales to buy items from local stores, and to mail them ... for making a profit.
darkoshi: (Default)
Yahoo sent an email to users on June 25, stating "Starting soon, free Yahoo Mail accounts will include an industry-leading 20GB of storage".

It sounds like they are increasing the storage limit, yahoo! But upon reading the email again, I wondered about this part: "If your mailbox exceeds the new storage limit after it goes into effect..."

The storage limit is actually being greatly reduced:
Yahoo Mail Storage Shrinks from 1 TB to 20 GB: What You Need to Know - article by Zach Nonnemacher, Content Manager at ZeroBounce, August 5, 2025.

It doesn't affect me as I don't keep many old emails on the server. But other people probably interpreted it the same way I did at first. I understand Yahoo wanting to put a positive spin on it, but it is counter-productive if Yahoo wants users to check their usage and do something about it.
This page mentions a deadline, which the emails I received did not: Yahoo Mail Users Must Clear Space or Upgrade by August 27 to Avoid Losing Access

So users who are over the new storage limit likely got another email with clearer details.

.

I was curious about the etymology of that surname, "Nonnemacher".

According to one page which I won't even link to as it seems to be AI-generated make-believe,
The surname Nonnemacher is of German origin and is derived from the Middle High German word "nonne" meaning "nun" and "macher" meaning "maker" or "craftsman." Therefore, the surname Nonnemacher can be interpreted as "nun maker" or "maker of nuns." It is likely that the name originally referred to someone who made or repaired religious garments or objects used by nuns, or it could have been a nickname for someone associated with a convent or religious community.

The Ancestry.com explanation is rather different:

German: occupational name for a gelder of hogs from Middle High German nunne nonne ‘nun’ and by transfer ‘castrated hog’.
+ an agent derivative of machen ‘to make’.
Source: Dictionary of American Family Names 2nd edition, 2022


What methods and tools do you use to castrate a pig?
Castrating Pigs
No use of anesthesia is mentioned on the above two pages; the below mention it, but it doesn't sound widely used in the U.S.
Castration of Pigs
Piglet castration

.

"Eunuch maker" seems a more logical term for a gelder than "Nun maker". So I wondered if the etymologies of "nun" and "eunuch" were related. But according to those links, they aren't.
darkoshi: (Default)
Errant thought from June 13:
The world keeps seeming more and more dystopian. But it is really amazing to be able to ask a computer complex things in natural language, and get back coherent, valid responses in natural language too. My mind often glosses over that wonder because of everything else going on. And also because of knowing that wonderful achievement has its own associated dystopian aspects to it, which will just get worse and worse as they are exploited.

.

Like this: The AI Slop Fight Between Iran and Israel

.

Kids growing up now and in the future may find it difficult to believe actual photos and movie footage from past atrocities, including the Holocaust. They will have no way to trust that the images are real and were not generated by AI. Perhaps if they looked through an old book with photos, and could trust that it was published in the year it said it was, before AI was capable of what it is now, perhaps that would be believable to them. But books are becoming rarer, especially old ones. Old books didn't have many photos. Were there many books with photos of atrocities? Encyclopedias would have perhaps a few photos for each topic. Certain magazines were more likely to have extensive photos. There may be digitized versions of the books and magazines available online, but then you get back to how can you trust that the digitized item you're looking at isn't a fake?

I'm already at that distrusting stage with much of what I see online. When you don't know what is trustworthy, you end up choosing to believe the things which align with your already-formed beliefs. "This aligns with my beliefs; I don't know if it is true, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was." "This doesn't align with my beliefs; why spend time and mental effort considering that it might be true when it very well might not be?"

smart coding buddy

Thursday, May 29th, 2025 02:40 am
darkoshi: (Default)
I feel like MS Copilot is my new buddy at work. The company has the business version which is supposed to keep the company's data private and secure, and we are authorized to use it. I haven't been using it inside of VS Code or other IDEs, which would require an extra license. The browser interface doesn't require an extra license and has met all my needs so far.

From what I last heard, the version that runs in VS Code can't yet answer questions that pertain to the whole big code-base, rather only to the current file you have open. To me, that wouldn't offer much benefit over the browser version, as I can paste the contents of a file into the browser chatbox or I could select the file to attach.

Anyway, MS Copilot helps me with creating PowerShell scripts and complex regex expressions, and with answering various questions. The version at work seems to give a lot more accurate answers than the one I access from my personal laptop; it's likely a better model. Unless the difference is due to the kinds of questions I ask there versus here.
darkoshi: (Default)
While shopping for bed slats (not for me), I found a set on the Kohl's website that says it is made "right here" in the USA from Canadian wood. But while checking out that brand's website, Continental Sleep, I belatedly realized the wording and grammar on their pages isn't quite right. So now I wonder, is the "Made in USA" claim a lie? Or do Chinese companies have factories in the U.S. making that kind of stuff? I could have sworn I saw that "Made in the USA" claim on one of their website pages too (for only that one product, which made it seem all the more dubious), but am not finding it anymore.

I looked up info on the company but found nothing other than a reference to "Continental Sleep Holdings", which was likely a different company, on a Wikipedia page about "Sleepeezee".

The reviews on the ContinentalSleep website seem fake too, with similar grammar and wording issues; not the kind Americans would make.

It's a bit surprising they haven't used an LLM to fix the grammar on their webpages. Once Chinese companies get better at doing that, there won't even be that tell to give them away.
darkoshi: (Default)
On both my work and personal laptops (Windows 10 and 11), I have noticed that the file context menu in Windows Explorer now includes an "Ask Copilot" option.

I have privacy and security concerns about that. If I accidentally select this option, will the file or its contents potentially be uploaded to the web somewhere? Will Microsoft use the contents of the file for other purposes? I didn't find clear answers on that. If I wanted Copilot to analyze a file, I would prefer to select the file thru other means. I don't need extra items in my context menu; mine is already lengthy due to other custom entries (which I actually use on a frequent basis) that I've added to it. So I will edit my registry to remove the entry from the menu.

Windows 11: Microsoft is adding Ask Copilot to right-click menu, how to remove it

Windows 11’s Copilot in Context Menus: Benefits, Concerns, and How to Remove It
darkoshi: (Default)
I came across this song on Youtube: The Cover Girls - Show Me Hearthrob Mix + Drumapella

The video shows an image of the vinyl record listing two separate songs on it, "Show Me (Heartthrob Mix)" and "Drumapella". I was curious what the 2nd song sounded like and wasn't clear if the video included it or not.

So I searched on that song title, "Drumapella", and was confused that the results listed many other songs by other artists with that word in their title. Searching on "what is drumapella" didn't give an answer. Wiktionary doesn't have the word listed either.

So I asked Copilot. This was the response:
"Drumapella" typically refers to a musical track or piece that combines the elements of a drumline (or drum track) with a cappella singing, which means singing without instrumental accompaniment. It's essentially a fusion of rhythmic drumming and vocal harmonies.
It’s an innovative way to blend percussive beats with vocal performances, creating a unique and dynamic sound.


Oh! So, "drum" + "a capella" = "drumapella". It makes sense.

Then I asked Copilot "What are some webpages that explain that?" The reply:
I couldn't find specific webpages that explain "drumapella" in detail, but there are some YouTube videos that showcase drumapella performances. These videos might give you a better understanding of how drumapella works...

It then gave links to 3 videos of songs with "drumapella" in the titles, none of whose descriptions explain what the word means. All 3 songs are from the same YouTube account, DjRubyEve. That account has been posting several remixes of famous songs per day, so I suspect the account uses AI to generate the remixes.

Other Youtube accounts have also posted "drumapella" songs, however. Some of these aren't drums + acapella singing, but rather only drums - a different usage/meaning of the word, which also makes sense.

A 1998 album with remixes of Madonna's song "Frozen" also has two "Drumapella" versions, so it is not a new word.

I am impressed that an LLM was able to figure out (presumably on its own, since I didn't find the word defined anywhere) that drumapella might be a combination of drums and acapella, especially as that didn't even occur to me until the LLM mentioned it.

.

I have been turning to the LLMs for answers more and more often when my web searches prove unilluminating.

.

When I originally searched on "what is drumapella", this Reddit page was one of the results: Is there a musical term for "a capella but percussion is allowed"?
I glossed over that page, because when I searched it, "drumapella" was not found. But now that I expanded all the collapsed comments in the thread, I found this one reply:
Dub?
”Drumcapella”?


So maybe the LLM partially got the answer from there even though "Drumcapella" has an extra "C" in it compared to "Drumapella".
darkoshi: (Default)
I have some family photos in which I know who is who in them. I have some other photos where I know the names of some people in it, but not who is who. And some photos with a mix of both. The latter photos may include other people for whom I have no names and am not concerned with at this time. It would be useful to have an AI tool where I could enter the names I know, matched to some faces, and have it figure out the other names and faces for me. I'm sure there are tools that can do that already. But would they be available to end-users like me, and are there ones that would run only on my computer without leaking any personal info to online companies?

I'd also find it very useful to have an AI tool that I could train to edit & rename my other photos like I normally do. I am so behind in doing that, making it hard to find photos from the last 4 years or so that I know I have. Even if the tool didn't do it perfect, it could make it easier maybe. But again, I want my photos and related data to remain private, not end up on the web somewhere.
darkoshi: (Default)
I saved some screenshots to show how easy it can be (in some cases) to get Copilot to help you with simple coding tasks.

These were my prompts:
1. Hello, please suggest how to code a powershell script to convert values like "1724143246792" to a timestamp format of YYYYMMDD-hhmmss

2. The script should take the input value as a parameter

3. Thank you but it isn't giving the right date. 1724143246792 should convert to approximately 20240819-132248, but the above script gives 16010102-235334

4. Thank you, that works better. But the output time is in UTC and I would like it in Eastern US time

5. Thank you, that is good. If the input value is from the summer, will the output be in EDT, or will it always be in EST?

( Screenshots of Copilot's answers behind the cut )
darkoshi: (Default)
It is really amazing how good some of these LLMs are, especially with programming topics. But also in understanding your question (even complicated ones) and responding with relevant responses. If you've tried them out a while back and been disappointed, you may want to try them out again to see how improved they are. Just sayin'.

If the first answer(s) you get aren't right or aren't what you wanted, reply to the LLM saying so, and it will probably give you a better answer on the next try.

As to where to find which LLM for testing, I'm no expert on that. I use the Copilot icon in the Edge browser to get to Copilot. I have some other links saved elsewhere for chatGpt, etc. Today was the first time I tried the gpt4o-mini AI via DuckDuckGo's anonymized interface - it had others available to choose from too.

September 2026

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223 242526
27282930   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Wednesday, October 7th, 2026 05:45 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios