"not authorized by any candidate" ... ahh, never mind
Sunday, September 29th, 2024 08:26 pmI am curious if it is legal for various political fund-raising groups to send email and paper communications which imply they are written by or at least written with the approval of a certain candidate, and containing their supposed signature at the end, when the same mailing contains the legal blurb "This communication is not authorized buy any candidate or candidate's committee."
Is there no law against pretending to be a public person and sending mail in their name?
In this case, the mail is from the Democratic National Committee, and while Joe Biden probably doesn't disapprove of the fund-raising mailing, I still don't understand how it can be legal for them to print his signature (along with the text "With gratitude, Joe Biden, President of the United States") if he didn't "authorize" it.
Okay..... I now remembered that Biden isn't a "candidate" anymore. But I still wonder if he specifically authorized them to send that message with his signature. I suppose it is possible.
A few years ago I created an email folder where I move political donation appeals rather than deleting them right away. I often don't trust them; it seems an easy way for scammers to get people to send them money, by pretending to raise money for a certain cause. If I wanted to donate, I would instead go to the official website to do it. But I created the email folder to track how often the same senders spam me and if they continue to do so after I unsubscribe.
That folder now comes in handy now to check how often the above occurs. I only found one or two examples where the email is purportedly written by the candidate and also has the "not authorized by..." clause.
There are several examples where instead of "Not authorized by", it actually says "Authorized by [the candidate]" or says "Paid by..." without mentioning if it is authorized or not.
Related info:
When Words Are Not Enough: FEC Fines Candidate Committee for Omitting Disclaimer Box in Mailings (March 2007)
I suppose that emails and mailings sent to a specific person may not be considered "public communication", so maybe that is why not all of the ones I get mention if they are authorized or not. And maybe some of those really are from scammers too.
...
WAIT! Now I see that this paper mailing has another paper in it which is purportedly written and signed by Kamala Harris, which ALSO has that blurb on it, "This communication is not authorized buy any candidate or candidate's committee"! So I'm back to my original question.
Is there no law against pretending to be a public person and sending mail in their name?
In this case, the mail is from the Democratic National Committee, and while Joe Biden probably doesn't disapprove of the fund-raising mailing, I still don't understand how it can be legal for them to print his signature (along with the text "With gratitude, Joe Biden, President of the United States") if he didn't "authorize" it.
Okay..... I now remembered that Biden isn't a "candidate" anymore. But I still wonder if he specifically authorized them to send that message with his signature. I suppose it is possible.
A few years ago I created an email folder where I move political donation appeals rather than deleting them right away. I often don't trust them; it seems an easy way for scammers to get people to send them money, by pretending to raise money for a certain cause. If I wanted to donate, I would instead go to the official website to do it. But I created the email folder to track how often the same senders spam me and if they continue to do so after I unsubscribe.
That folder now comes in handy now to check how often the above occurs. I only found one or two examples where the email is purportedly written by the candidate and also has the "not authorized by..." clause.
There are several examples where instead of "Not authorized by", it actually says "Authorized by [the candidate]" or says "Paid by..." without mentioning if it is authorized or not.
Related info:
When Words Are Not Enough: FEC Fines Candidate Committee for Omitting Disclaimer Box in Mailings (March 2007)
If the public communication is authorized by a candidate, his or her authorized committee or an agent thereof but is paid for by any other person, the disclaimer must clearly state that the communication is paid for by such other person and is authorized by the candidate, committee or agent.
...
If the communication is not authorized by a candidate, his or her committee or an agent thereof, the disclaimer must state the full name and permanent street address, telephone number or World Wide Web address of the person who paid for the communication, and that the communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
I suppose that emails and mailings sent to a specific person may not be considered "public communication", so maybe that is why not all of the ones I get mention if they are authorized or not. And maybe some of those really are from scammers too.
...
WAIT! Now I see that this paper mailing has another paper in it which is purportedly written and signed by Kamala Harris, which ALSO has that blurb on it, "This communication is not authorized buy any candidate or candidate's committee"! So I'm back to my original question.