springasprung

Friday, March 22nd, 2019 12:43 am
darkoshi: (Default)
As someone else wrote, Spring sprung! Spring sprung! Spring sprung a rung a rung!

Asteroid!
Small asteroid to sweep closer than moon’s distance. It was at its closest a few hours ago. I tried to find out where in the sky it would be, and if it's visible to the naked eye or not, but couldn't find any mention of that. The sky is rather hazy here tonight; can only see the brightest stars anyway.

I've got a boom boom drum. Got it for my birthday a while back. It goes Boom! Boom! Boom boom boom boom...

Last week on the way to work, while stopped at a stoplight, it was breezy and I saw a cloud of yellow pollen pluming outward from the pine trees up ahead. I'm glad pollen doesn't bother me.

Baby got a cold. I accidentally poured the cold "medicine" down the drain, thinking it was water in the bottle (too thin and clear for cold syrup), already rinsed out. Then I saw that it was labelled as a homeopathic brew, and realized my likely mistake. Ooops. I told the niece about my mistake, and also about how homeopathic items aren't proven to work and are diluted and wacky. I probably could have worded it better, but that's how my spur of the moment verbal skills are.

I checked the cold syrups in my medicine cabinet, but all were labelled as not for infant use. Checking online, I read that it's not recommended to give babies any cold medicines. Maybe that's why the niece had bought something homeopathic; maybe that's the only thing available marked as safe for babies. (Because it's basically water!)

Driving to work, I continued feeling slightly bad, thinking the niece would suspect I poured it down the drain on purpose. I decided to stop by the store on the way home to get some replacement, even if the only thing I could find was another homeopathic one. But I did find some non-homeopathic remedies (though I'm not sure that one is really any more effective); they even had ibuprofen drops labelled for infants.

Spring a ding ding.

Grey's Anatomy had a genderqueer character on tonight's show, using the "they" pronouns. I was watching it with Qiao, and was inwardly pleased (they're like me!), yet didn't feel like saying anything out loud about it to Qiao. I wondered if Qiao even remembers that I don't identify as female. What difference does it make, sigh. I have a boom boom drum.

Boom a doom doom.
darkoshi: (Default)
Zorro probably wonders why loud music always starts playing right after ze gets comfy and starts grooming zirself.

.

Zorro probably wonders why loud music always starts playing right after they get comfy and start grooming themself.

.

[personal profile] marahmarie questioned what pronoun to use for a burping squirrel, and it got me thinking.

There's not much point in using gendered pronouns for animals, as usually there's no need to distinguish them based on their sex. For example, "That bird is squawking so loud, it's giving me a headache." When there is a need to point out an animal's sex, one can simply say so: "That's a male bird"; "That's a female bird".

The pronoun "it" is gender-neutral but also impersonal/depersonalizing. We don't usually call a companion animal "it", but rather "he" or "she", because "it" sounds too impersonal. Generally, we know the sex of our companion animals, so we know which gendered pronoun to use.

Even so, calling animals "he" or "she" based on their sex seems silly to me sometimes. Those pronouns evoke mental gender-related connotations and stereotypes which are even more ridiculous when applied to animals than when applied to people*.

It's not usually obvious however, what sex an unfamiliar animal is. So one can either call it "it", or one can guess and call it "he" or "she".

If some gender-neutral pronoun other than "it" came into common usage for people, we could use it for animals too, both familiar and unfamiliar ones. We would no longer need to distinguish between them based on their sex, nor depersonalize them.

If that happened, I wonder if it would also affect how people think of animals in general. Would people start to feel more kinship/empathy for them? Would people who are unable to feel such empathy tend to call animals "it" while people who felt empathy would use the other pronoun?


* A character in a book I'm reading, in saying good-bye to his horse, said (translated from German) "You're the prettiest, smartest, and most dependable companion one could ever wish for." It was a female horse. If the horse were male, I doubt the character would have called it pretty. Yet, are female horses prettier than male horses? I think not.

.

I was also thinking that while "they" is gaining traction as a gender-neutral pronoun, it would be good to have another option. One to use when we don't know or care about a person's gender, and another for people whose gender we know is other than male or female.

The singular pronoun "they" can already be used for both cases. But due to the first usage, it feels somewhat impersonal and distancing. While I don't mind being called "they" (and sometimes would appreciate it), it's not really my preferred pronoun.

But having 2 such pronouns might bring about too many complexities.

.

The thoughts that spark a post like this take only a few minutes in my head. Why then, does it take me over 2 hours to put those thoughts into coherent written form? And even then, the sentences feel awkward, and I feel like I'm leaving out half of what I wanted to write?

sexuality. pronouns.

Saturday, March 13th, 2010 03:08 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I don't understand main-stream sexuality, except from an outsider's perspective. I only understand it based on the media I've been exposed to, not because it makes sense to me. I don't understand why female breasts are considered sexual, but men's chests aren't. I don't understand why breasts with nipples visible are considered nude and sexual, while breasts with pasties or tassles covering the nipples aren't. I don't understand why people like sucking on nipples or penises. I don't understand why TV show characters tongue-kiss* each other so much and so often; I don't understand why people are supposedly drawn to that activity. I don't understand why having sex is supposed to be part of a relationship, and why not having sex is supposed to indicate a lack of a relationship. I'm sure it makes intrinsic sense to most other people, but it doesn't to me; it's all hear-say to me.

While thinking about pasties and tassles, the thought occurred to me, what if I guy were naked except for a pasty/tassle on the end of his penis? Would the pasty/tassle render him non-nude? heheheh....

.

There seem to be a fair number of butch lesbians and butch-presenting females who are deeply offended by being referred to with male pronouns... they expect to be perceived as physically female based on the gender cues of their body, in spite of their clothing and presentation, and they interpret a male pronoun as an insult. They expect everyone to know that a masculine-presenting female still expects to be referred to with female pronouns, and that the only reason for someone to use male pronouns for them would be purposeful spite.

There are also a lot of transgendered people who are deeply offended by being referred to with a pronoun which doesn't match their clothing and presentation. They expect to be perceived and treated as the gender which matches their presentation, regardless of the gender cues of their body. They may interpret being referred to with the other pronoun as purposeful spite. They expect everyone to know that a person expects to be referred to with the pronoun which matches their gender presentation.

I think there's more emotional pain involved for transgendered people when they are referred to by their non-preferred pronoun, as that indicates that they have failed to pass as their preferred gender, and that their internal identity and self have not even been recognized. Whereas for butch females, it's more a perception of their identity and self having been recognized and belittled.

I don't think there's going to be a solution to the dichotomy of pronoun expectations any time soon.

.

* edited to replace "snog" with "tongue-kiss"... To me, a "kiss" is a simple peck on the cheeks or lips, whereas "snog" sounds like faces being shoved together; noses being squished hoggish-like; mouths open and tongues shoving. But the dictionary definition of snog is "kissing and cuddling", so maybe it isn't the right word after all. But "french kiss" sounds rather outdated and childish, and "tongue-kiss" doesn't seem much more descriptive... it sounds like 2 tongues pecking each other lightly... Oh, well, whatever.

(no subject)

Monday, March 17th, 2008 09:29 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I've been using ze/zir as my preferred 3rd-gender and non-gender-specific pronouns (of the more popular options, anyway), but I realized today a problem with them. In the questions "Does ze ...?" or "Is ze ...?", "ze" is not very audibly distinguishable from "he".

(no subject)

Thursday, May 8th, 2003 09:37 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
Hey, everyone, anyone - feel free to refer to me as 'zie', or 'he', or 'she', or whatever pronoun you like. I won't take offense at any of them... Or you could refer to me as 'you'. That'd work too. Of course, you probably won't be referring to me at all. But hey, hey, hey, whatever. Just thought I'd make it crystal-clear. And if you're curious about my gender, you could call me androgyne, or male, or female, or whatever. Or even neutrois, although that term doesn't seem widespread. Oh, doesn't that just drive you crazy, when someone won't tell you which specific gender they are? I don't mean to annoy anyone. But posting which gender my birth certificate says in this entry would sort of defeat the whole purpose of it now.

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Saturday, January 3rd, 2026 10:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios