darkoshi: (Default)
If you're looking to buy a calendar for next year, there are some truly excellent ones at deviantart.com.

Most of the calendars are priced between $20 and $30. If you click on the "Buy This Print" link for a specific calendar, it will let you see the price and the images for all the months.

This page explains that even calendars whose front cover art or name indicates a past year will have the contents printed for the current/coming year.
darkoshi: (Default)
In February of this year, I posted about a song I was trying to find for purchase. At the time, Amazon did not have it available as an MP3 on the U.S. site. I found it on the U.K. Amazon site, on one of a series of "Disco Discharge" CDs. Then I found the same CD on the U.S. site too. At the time, I considered buying the CD. I made a note of it on my "maybe sometime later" list.

Fast-forward to November. Now, the CD that I had found before is no longer even listed on the U.K. site. It is still listed on the U.S. site, but from only 3 sellers, each of whom is asking over $100 for it. I didn't like the CD enough to pay that much for it.

However, now the song is also available on the U.S. site in MP3 format, in several versions. There's even a remix!

advertising fails

Sunday, March 17th, 2013 12:06 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
Most of the time when I click on an internet ad, the page that opens does NOT display the item that was advertised in the link. Often, I am forced to enable JavaScript for the domain, in order to see anything at all. But even when I do that and re-open the page, most of the time, it shows a "sorry, page not found" message, or simply a top-level page with no mention of the specific item I was looking for. Or it shows a page full of various items, which may or may not contain an item like the one I was looking for.

What's the point of these companies even paying for advertisements, when their links don't work?

Even Amazon! I searched on a computer model, and the ads at the top of the Google page have a link to: http://www.amazon.com/Computers (not even specific to the model I was looking for), and yet the page at that link displays: "Looking for something? We're sorry. The Web address you entered is not a functioning page on our site "

Update: Part of the problem must be related to my browser security settings. The Google search results show the same Amazon link in IE. But when I click the link in IE, it opens up a different URL including the specific search string. Google must be manipulating the URL behind the scenes. Oh well, too bad. I don't care to change my security settings just to make some ads work.
darkoshi: (Default)
I wanted post reviews of 2 items I had bought from Target.com.

After writing the first review, I was informed that it was over 1800 characters, but only 1000 were allowed. So I had to figure out what to cut out while keeping the important parts. Then, after submitting it, it didn't even show up with the other reviews! Hopefully that is only temporary.

Now, after writing the 2nd review, the page keeps giving me an error message "Please modify your submission before continuing." It doesn't even say what is wrong with the submission! If I change the review to just "TESTING TESTING this is a test", then I don't get the error. So apparently, it doesn't like what I wrote in the review. But it doesn't say why!

I spend my precious time trying to be helpful by posting authentic reviews, and this is what I get for it.

Now I'm not going to trust any reviews I read on their site. Surely any other real reviewers like me would be similarly off-put by all this BS.

... after more fiddling around with my review, I've determined the error is shown whenever I include the word "pipe" anywhere in the review. If I remove the "pipe" word, no error. WTF???
The product has metal pipes! What is so bad about me mentioning something about the pipe!!??

After some thinking, I thought the problem might be because I used the words "knob" and/or "rubber" (as in "wood knobs" and "rubber band"). But "pipe"!?

Oh, looky. "Pipe" is not accepted, but "pipes" is. Well, maybe "pipe" should be my new 4-letter word. That pipe-dammit pipety piping site wouldn't piping accept my piping wonderful review.
darkoshi: (Default)
I was looking to legally buy an mp3 version of a particular song (Margherita by Massara) which was popular when I was a kid.

(I had stumbled across Boney M's version of the song, which subsequently led me to discover the name/artist of the original song which I was familiar with.)

I didn't find the song on Amazon.com - it is only available there on vinyl (used). The song must not have been much of a hit in the U.S.

Since I lived in Germany when it was popular, I then checked the Amazon.de German MP3 site. But again, the only results are on vinyl (used).

Then, since it was an Italian band, I checked the Amazon.it Italian MP3 site. That site didn't have any results for it.

Now, I just thought to check the UK Amazon site... it doesn't have the song for sale individually, but it *does* have a EuroDisco MP3 album for sale with that song included! The other songs on the album sound good enough that I'd consider buying the whole thing.

I wonder why there isn't an Amazon page that lets you search all the country-specific Amazon sites at once...

While browsing other songs on the German site, I couldn't help but notice the Terms of Use link. The Terms state that based on agreements with the music content providers, the German site only sells music to people living in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. ("Wie von unseren Anbietern von Musikinhalten vorgeschrieben, sind Musikinhalte nur für Kunden in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz verfügbar.")

Furthermore, all the other Amazon MP3 sites, including the U.S. one, have the same restriction in their Terms of Use. It is the last sentence of section 2.2:
2.2 Restrictions. You must comply with all applicable copyright and other laws in your use of the Music Content. Except as set forth in Section 2.1 above, you may not redistribute, transmit, assign, sell, broadcast, rent, share, lend, modify, adapt, edit, license or otherwise transfer or use the Music Content. We do not grant you any synchronization, public performance, promotional use, commercial sale, resale, reproduction or distribution rights for the Music Content. As required by our Music Content providers, Music Content is available only to customers located in the United States.

What a let-down.


Well, let's see. The MP3 album from the UK site is sold in CD-format on the U.S. site. The name of the Margherita song is spelled differently on that page, which may be why it didn't show up in my search results before.... Nope, doing a search on that alternate spelling brings up nothing at all, not even this album. Weird.

So, I could buy the CD, and then rip the songs to MP3. It would be a lot easier if I could simply buy & download the songs in MP3 format to begin with.

(no subject)

Friday, August 10th, 2012 12:56 am
darkoshi: (Default)
What does the Amazon sign-in page use the Adobe FlashPlayer plugin for?

silly security

Sunday, April 22nd, 2012 03:31 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
Apparently, BestBuy.com doesn't let you include special characters in your account password. I tried 4 different passwords, all of which followed the stated guidelines (6 to 30 characters, must include at least 1 number), and yet were rejected. Then I tried one without any special characters, and it was accepted.
darkoshi: (Default)
I watched the season premiere of "The Voice" with Qiao tonight. I was quite impressed by several of the singers. There's one song (a cover of Nirvana's "Come As You Are") that I would even pay to download... the show's website has it for sale on iTunes. Hmmm.

After a bit of research, it seems that all music currently being sold on iTunes is DRM-free, and that it is in the AAC format, which can be converted to MP3. So I should be able to download it and play it on my music player of choice. However, in order to buy a song from the site, you need to have iTunes installed, and I have no intention of installing iTunes on my computer. So I'll just post a YouTube video of the song here instead. It seems silly for a site to require you to have a program installed, in order to buy something from them. Back when the iTunes songs included DRM, it made sense that you needed a special player for them. But I don't understand why buying music from iTunes still requires having the iTunes program installed.


Rebecca Loebe - Come As You Are

Video title: Rebecca Loebe - Come as you are Nirvana cover
Posted by: slowpacedrecords
URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y5srJL_HQ_I


Her website (with other songs available for purchase):
http://rebeccaloebe.com/
darkoshi: (Default)
I recently bought scent samples from The Mad Poet's Perfumery Menace. Because all of the descriptions sounded intriguing, I got one of each available scent. They are made with essential oils... I've got a nice collection of essential oils of my own, and sometimes use them to make a room smell nice. I enjoy sniffing new scents and combinations of scents; it's like opening a present to discover what's inside. So now I've got a bunch of little presents to open and sniff. So far, most of them have been quite a wonderful experience. I might even take to wearing them on my skin once in a while.

There's some underlying ingredient (I suspect artificial musk) in many commercial perfumes which is off-putting to me, but I don't have the same reaction to essential oils.

I got to wondering about the logic in having some scents marketed as "feminine" and some as "masculine". I'd expect heterosexual people to choose scents for themselves to wear, which are pleasant to both themselves and their existing and/or prospective partners.
Therefore a "feminine" scent should be pleasing to both women and men, and a "masculine" scent should also be pleasing to both women and men. So why are the scents marketed by gender? Why do women prefer a certain type of scent on themselves versus on their partners, and vice versa? If they like a certain scent on themselves, why wouldn't they like it on their partners too?

Or is there a non-cultural bias of men towards favoring certain scents, and women towards favoring other scents? As long as either group of scents isn't off-putting to the other gender, that could lead to a scent divide along gender lines. But that wouldn't explain why a woman would prefer one scent on her and a different scent on her masculine partner.

That seems to simply be cultural... certain types of scent have been deemed more acceptable for women, and other types have been deemed more acceptable for men.

Based on traditional divisions of work by gender... Food scents may be associated with women, because if a woman smells like nice food, that may indicate that she is a good cook. Woodsy scents may be associated with men, because if a man smells woodsy, that may mean he's been hard at work in the woods. Or if he smells spicy, that may mean he's been hard at work in the spice-mines. :-)
darkoshi: (Default)
Oh boy. The delivery of the tech item I had ordered for Forestfen somehow got badly botched. Instead of receiving a printer/scanner all-in-one, I received a big box full of paper shopping bags! The bags were presumably intended for a certain large chain store whose name is shown on the bags, yet how they got mixed up with a printer/scanner, I have no idea. The store I ordered from was apologetic about the situation and will be sending me a new package.

.

More info on debit cards vs credit cards, from earlier this year -
Debit vs. Credit Cards: How They Stack Up
I like it when articles show dates on them like that one does. Otherwise it is hard to tell how outdated the information may be.

.

If you are paid by someone with a paper check, and you are not certain of the check's veracity, it is apparently safer** to try to deposit it at an ATM (even though it may bounce), than to try to cash it in person at a bank. If it is fraudulent and you try to cash it, you may end up handcuffed and in jail. That incident happened 4 years ago, but I assume the same kind of thing could still happen now.
** All I've been able to figure from reading comments on that story is that depositing a bad check is less incriminating than trying to cash it. Otherwise, how could anyone feel safe accepting checks for payment from people not known to them?
Curiously, young people commenting on the story seem to be of the opinion that using checks at all is old-fashioned and idiotic.

hard to believe

Sunday, November 21st, 2010 03:26 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
This shop on Amazon.com is selling batteries for various cordless phones for only 1 cent each! How can they do that? Are they trying to get rid of stock? Do they make their money off of the standard Amazon shipping charge?
Elsewhere one of the same batteries I was looking for costs between $7 and $16 each.

ETA: After posting this, I recalled a bad transaction I had with the company in question (EMT company) a few years ago... I had ordered a cell phone battery from them, but what they sent to me turned out to be a used battery that wouldn't even hold a charge. So I won't be dealing with that company again.

(no subject)

Sunday, December 13th, 2009 02:10 am
darkoshi: (Default)
Huh. Amazon's mp3 prices are all about 99 cents, even for 74 minute tracks, like the ones from one-track nature sounds/relaxation CDs.
darkoshi: (Default)
Don't ever order anything from "Home Trends" or "QCI Direct". They will start sending you a paper catalog every month, and they won't stop sending them no matter how many times you email them requesting to be taken off their mailing list, nor no matter how many times you call them.

The only reply they give to the emails is "What you received is a promotional catalog. As long as no orders are placed out of the catalog, the catalog will stop on its own." It's been a whole fucking year, and they are still sending me their goddamn catalogs. I don't care how nifty some of the things they sell may seem, I will NEVER EVER order anything from them again and I hope no one else does, until they learn to respect their customers' wishes.

(no subject)

Monday, December 22nd, 2008 12:56 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
When I asked my foster sister what she'd like for xmas, one of the things she suggested was some reggae music. So I browsed the reggae songs available for download on Calabash and Amazon, and purchased several that sounded good to me. I made her a mix CD out of them.

The Terms and Conditions for both those sites though, say that the music you purchase is non-transferable. So by downloading music as a gift for someone else, I'm already breaking the terms. It's really stupid that the terms seem to make it illegal to buy a gift for someone else. I don't really understand why when you buy MP3s online, it should be any different from when you buy software online. With software, you're generally allowed to transfer it to another person as long as you remove it from your own computer and no longer use it yourself. Wasn't there even some court case which caused those to be the default conditions? I think it was adjudicated that the software companies aren't allowed to stop you from re-selling the software when you no longer want it, just as is the case with any physical item you may purchase.

So anyway, I'm already breaking the terms... and now, after making the mix CD, I'd really like to keep a copy for myself too, since I like the music. So what is the ethical thing to do? I don't want to cheat the artists out of any royalties they might get from 2 purchases as opposed to one. On the Calabash site, it used to be that you couldn't even buy the same song twice, as it kept track of the songs you've bought... now it appears to let you, although I haven't tried it. The amazon site appears to let you buy the same song twice as well.

Hmmm.

(no subject)

Friday, August 22nd, 2008 09:37 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
Hoo-ray for e-Bay. I found climate control knobs for my car there, which I couldn't find anywhere else. I had bought a generic 3-piece assortment at an auto store, which had one knob that looked exactly right, but turned out to be about a millimeter too narrow on the stem. Since my knobs broke, I haven't been able to even turn on the fan to clear the windshield when it fogs up. Hopefully the new ones will fit and won't break.

I bought a nice-looking dragon fruit at a new Asian market in town, as well as a bunch of leek flowers.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
1819 202122 2324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Friday, May 23rd, 2025 05:55 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios