chatGPT and trust

Thursday, May 4th, 2023 12:39 am
darkoshi: (Default)
One concern I have about ChatGPT and similar things is how they will affect us being able to find reliable and useful information online.

In the last few years, I've noticed more and more webpages which appear to consist of data scraped from other places on the web. These pages contain a series of questions and answers on a particular topic. One can tell a human didn't write or compose the page, because the questions are repetitive and include many variations of the same question. The answers in one part of the page sometimes contradict other answers on the same page.

Presumably these pages have ads on them, and the people who create them do so to get money from ad-traffic. I don't usually see that due to my ad-blockers.

Now with ChatGPT, I imagine that rather than generating pages like that with data scraped from the web, people will generate pages with questions answered by ChatGPT. The text on these pages will look much more convincing than the ones out there now. The information will probably be less reliable. The reliable information sources will be greatly outnumbered by the unreliable ones, and it will be difficult to distinguish them.

Maybe it has already happened. For example, this page: Are American Toads Poisonous to Humans, Dogs, or Cats? doesn't seem like one of those generated/scraped pages. But it repeats itself multiple times which makes me suspicious. I can't tell from reading it whether I should trust it or not. I know that I probably shouldn't trust anything, especially not a random website I've come across, but for non-critical questions, it's nice to do a search and find a plausible answer that satisfies my curiosity or need-to-know, and then get on with my life. It's nicer if the plausible answers are true or at least based on what someone believes to be true, as opposed to some made-up answer.

I worry that there will be fake accounts on sites like Dreamwidth, posting content generated by tools like ChatGPT. I worry that someday I won't be able to tell which accounts are real people and which not, even when I interact with them. Will that affect my desire to interact with other people online?

I worry about art and music and poems, that I won't be able to tell if a human had a large part in making them or not. And that I won't feel as enthusiastic about them, for not knowing.
darkoshi: (Default)
Temporary policy: ChatGPT is banned
"The primary problem is that while the answers which ChatGPT produces have a high rate of being incorrect, they typically look like they might be good and the answers are very easy to produce. There are also many people trying out ChatGPT to create answers, without the expertise or willingness to verify that the answer is correct prior to posting. Because such answers are so easy to produce, a large number of people are posting a lot of answers. The volume of these answers (thousands) and the fact that the answers often require a detailed read by someone with at least some subject matter expertise in order to determine that the answer is actually bad has effectively swamped our volunteer-based quality curation infrastructure."


One reply is about the difficulty of determining which answers are from ChatGPT.
One reply suggests limiting how often a user can post answers, to at least reduce the flood of answers copied from ChatGPT.

The highest-voted reply, however, gives answers from ChatGPT about why StackOverflow should or should not allow AI-generated answers. :D

..

I tried out ChatGPT for myself the first time a couple weeks ago. I asked it how to add a Mouse Settings shortcut to the Windows 11 start menu, considering that it didn't have a "Pin to Start" option. ChatGPT suggested several reasonable-sounding methods which I hadn't found when I was searching for an answer, but unfortunately they didn't work for my scenario.

I was fairly impressed by the interaction, but it lends credence to the statement above, "while the answers which ChatGPT produces have a high rate of being incorrect, they typically look like they might be good".

Google search UI

Monday, April 3rd, 2023 03:55 am
darkoshi: (Default)
The design of the Google Search results page has changed lately. I don't remember exactly how it looked before (it often changes in subtle ways), so it is hard to be sure what changed and when.

Each search result having an icon is a change, I think.

There seems to be a lot of wasted space on the right side of the page. I don't remember what used to be there.
Oh, I see. Depending on what you search on, it shows something in the upper right. I remember now, it often links to Wikipedia there.
Searching on famous people, the layout of results definitely looks different than they used to.

The semi-continuous scrolling is definitely new. It now loads 15 pages of results before showing a "More results" button. The bottom of each results page no longer has links to the next/previous pages of results and the links to the 2nd/3rd/4th/etc./last pages of results.

The Settings button lets you turn off continuous scrolling, but then it still only shows a "More results" button at the bottom of the page instead of the old style navigation links.


.

Google Introduces Updated Desktop Search Design (2023/03/08)

Google Search Website Design History
This is a nice history, but the last example of the search results page is from 2012.
darkoshi: (Default)
Our SC primary elections are on Tuesday. I voted on Friday already, the last day of early voting. One bad aspect about early voting is that you may miss out on debates or interviews that are held later on.

Friday evening, a debate was televised between 3 of the Democratic candidates for South Carolina governor: Carlton Boyd, Joe Cunningham, and Mia McLeod. There are 2 more candidates who didn't take part in the debate.

It had been hard for me to decide which of the gubernatorial candidates to vote for, and I was curious if watching the debate before voting would have changed my mind. So I watched part of the debate.

When I had looked up info before voting, I found hardly any information on Boyd. I didn't even find a website, which knocked him off my list. But his performance in the debate impressed me. During one answer, he mentioned having a website, so I searched for it again, harder this time. It still did not show up in the Google or the DuckDuckGo results. But I finally found a link to it (see above) on Facebook.

I think the debate would not have changed my mind about who to vote for. But I felt bad at not having tried harder to find Boyd's website to begin with. When I originally didn't find it, I assumed he didn't have one.

Now in researching it further, I think the site's robots.txt file is causing the problem. Based on this info on robots.txt syntax, it looks like his would prevent all search engines from crawling the site. His webpages have "noindex" tags too. No wonder the site isn't showing up in search results. I will drop him a message about it.
darkoshi: (Default)
Yahoo Answers to shut down May 4, 2021

First Yahoo Groups, now Yahoo Answers. Sounds like it won't even be left available in read-only mode, as that's what it is saying it is set to now already.

Most of the time, the answers I found posted in Yahoo Answers weren't very good. But every once in a while I'd find something there which I didn't find anywhere else.
Oh, well.

.

Paper books whose content can't be searched by a simple typed query.
It occurred to me again recently how outdated that feels to me now.
Each book its own private trove of information, only accessible to those who make the effort required to explore it. Each person having to make their own map, their own index and bookmarks, of what is where inside the book, if they want to find the way back to a particular place in it.
darkoshi: (Default)
...kids will still want to swap for a different color or style.

This search phrase returns what I was looking for on DuckDuckGo, but not on Google:
school facemask "paw patrol" spiderman lunch swap

That is unusual, and speaks well of DDG. Replacing "facemask" with "mask" brings back the wanted result on Google too, but it's odd that their algorithms aren't doing that replacement automatically. Normally Google returns as many or more relevant results for me than DDG, but not this time.

This is what I was looking for, a wryly prophetic* tweet I'd seen shared on FB yesterday:
You gon send your kid to school with the Paw Patrol mask and he gon come home with a Spider Man mask because he made a trade at lunch. Whole school gon be shut down the next day.


*I'd have written premoniscient, but the dictionaries are telling me that isn't a word no matter how much it sounds like one to me. "Premonitory" is a word but it doesn't sound right to me at all. "Prescient" is also a word, but isn't exactly the meaning I intended.

..

Auditory illusion, "Brainstorm or Green Needle?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pRY3wlKwm8

I only hear green needle. The first part could be either brain or green; those words sound similar. But how can the 2nd part possibly be "storm"? - it has clearly 2 syllables!? Even if I stretch out "storm" in my mind to be as long as 2 syllables, it sounds nothing at all like the sound in the video clip.
darkoshi: (Default)
It's so easy nowadays with the internet to look up information and to share information with others.

When I was a kid, if I wanted an answer to a question, I'd have to ask people, or look it up in the encyclopedia or dictionary that we had at home, or go to a library and search through books. But even if you did all that, the answer might not be found.

That isn't to say that I spent much time as a child searching the library for answers to hard questions.

But still. Even if you had a whole library of books, where would you look up the answer to a question like, "Why do my shoes squeak and creak, and how can I make them stop?"

Sometimes you can figure out answers by yourself. In the past, when my shoes squeaked, it was usually due to friction between the tongue and the top of the shoe, or due to small holes in the sole. I found ways to prevent those noises.

This time, the culprit was neither the tongues nor the soles. Internet searching provided some answers I hadn't thought of. The foam layers on one of the insoles* were coming apart. So I glued them back together with silicon sealer. That fixed one of the squeaks. I also sprinkled talcum** powder under the insoles, and after a few repetitions, that got rid of most of the creaks. One of the creaks kept coming back, which I now suspect was due to a thick thread that was under the insole, perhaps letting air in. I trimmed the thread. For the time being, the squeaks and creaks are all gone. Yay.

*I originally thought that insoles are glued in, but in many cases they aren't, and you can simply pull them out.
**Corn starch didn't sound like a good idea, as it might get pasty when wet. Nor did I want my shoes to smell like baby powder. Luckily, I found that non-baby-scented talcum powder can be found in the pharmacy foot-care section. The one I got smells like wintergreen!

Anyway, I was thinking about the above, and also thinking about what will happen to that kind of data over time. People die. Then what happens to the data they've posted to the internet? If they had their own website domain, and if no one takes over paying the domain fees or web hosting provider fees after they die, their website will be gone. If they've posted data on other sites, then it will depend on how long those sites stay around. Websites are not permanent, and most will disappear or radically change over time. Some data may get archived on various sites. But the Internet Archive, for instance, while it has old webpages, isn't very searchable in the normal sense. Google's cache is sometimes useful, but I'm not sure how long Google maintains cached data, once the original websites are gone.

So the answers that I can find today while doing an internet search, may someday no longer be there to be found. Or may no longer be found in the same places. New people will have to post the answers in new places.

Another useful piece of info I found today is that if your Lotus Notes locks up for a long time whenever you paste rich text from a webpage into an email, check the Lotus Notes proxy settings. Make sure it doesn't list an old proxy server which is no longer valid.

scissors

Sunday, December 16th, 2012 03:37 am
darkoshi: (Default)
These scissors which I had were useful for cutting open clamshell packaging - the angled handles kept my hands safely away from the sharp edges of the cut plastic. But as can be seen, one of the handles broke off:



I searched for a replacement in a few stores, but failed to find any similar scissors. The so-called "offset scissors" that are available have only one of the handles angled upwards, not both.

Then I searched the web, but still failed to find any scissors like these. Who knew that I had such a unique pair of scissors? They were previously Forestfen's, but I don't know where they originally came from.

The closest thing I have found is trauma shears. I've read that they also work well for cutting open clamshell packaging. So I'll try a pair of them.


Update: Found this somewhat similar pair of scissors: Fons & Porter Chenille and Applique Scissors. Still plan to get the trauma shears - they sound sturdier.

This is one of those cases which serves to remind me that there are many things which exist or have existed, without ever having been photographed, documented, and indexed (to be easily found by me) on the internet, or at least on the part of the internet which I access.
darkoshi: (Default)



Once automated transcriptions and automated translations both work better, we'll be able to watch videos in other languages, with captions generated in our own language. Maybe they'll even be able to update the audio stream so that you hear the same voice, but speaking your language instead of the original language.

.

And in other news, a cricket was crawling up the wall. The first one this year, inside the house. It was given an armed escort back outside.

spiffy search engines

Saturday, July 2nd, 2011 11:51 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
Here are some neat search engines I've been trying out today:

DuckDuckGo is spiffy. I love the name! It doesn't collect or share personal information, and has good privacy options. It has lots of settings that you can configure. Here's an article about it.

Gigablast is another neat little search engine, for which "90% of its power usage comes from wind energy."

IceRocket is a nice blog search engine.

ask.com (previously known as "Ask Jeeves") has pretty good search results.

search engines

Saturday, July 2nd, 2011 02:52 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I want to diversify my search engine usage. I like Google, but some of its "features" annoy me. Such as when it slows down my typing by searching on every keystroke, and when it returns results for a similar search phrase rather than the exact search I entered. Some of those features can be turned off, but it requires being logged in and/or allowing Google to store cookies, which I'd rather not.

I suppose I could simply use a different interface to the Google Search engine, rather than using its website. But I'd also like to branch out and start getting results from other engines too. So a meta-search engine might be ideal. Or perhaps a plug-in that searches multiple configurable search engines at once.

I've found lists of lots of search engines. But if any of you would like to share with me which ones other than Google are your favorites, please do.

(no subject)

Friday, September 28th, 2007 09:57 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I was thinking... (I do a lot of that, btw)... about how much I rely on Google for looking up information. And yet, how Google hasn't re-indexed the pages I've submitted to it since I moved my site earlier this year, even though a couple of those pages used to get a lot of hits on my old site. Of course, I can't expect those pages to remain popular indefinitely. But still, I was thinking about how, if Google were to choose to specifically filter its results... filter out certain pages or certain topics from its search results, how people like me might never be aware of what we were missing. It could be a kind of subtle censorship.

When using Google, I generally think of myself "searching the whole internet", when really, I'm just searching a part of it - those pages that Google has indexed.

At work today I was doing a Google-search related to a problem we were having, and found a page containing a question regarding the same problem, posted by someone else on my team. That got indexed fast.

(no subject)

Wednesday, July 11th, 2007 07:44 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I did a Google search on my Whirlpool refrigerator model #, ED26SSXL (or ED26SSXLNR0), and there is only a single result - a page in Spanish. Isn't that odd? I wonder how old it is; it doesn't look old.

Yahoo has my cursewords page indexed at its new URL. But it only shows up if you search on certain terms, like words from the title. If you search a random group of cursewords listed on the page, it doesn't necessarily show up in the results. That seems odd too; I thought you could do searches like that and find pages with the words. I wonder if Google indexes it better, but Google doesn't have it indexed yet.

I got the outlet fixed after all. The next day already, I was eager to get a new receptacle and try again.


http://www.hammerzone.com/archives/elect/repairs/outlet/replace.htm
This page has a really nice instructions for replacing outlets, with good pictures.


http://forums.mikeholt.com/archive/index.php/t-77654.html
Thread regarding receptacles with backstab versus backwire connections. If using backwire connections, one ought not also connect wires to the screws on the side, because the same screw is used for tightening the connections in back and on the side.
The backwire receptacle I bought had 4 holes each for the black and white wires which was more than adequate.

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1234567
8910 1112 1314
15161718192021
222324 25 262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Friday, July 4th, 2025 05:14 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios