darkoshi: (Default)
If you watch this, don't miss the part at the very end!



Video title: Billy Porter - Children (Official Video)
Posted by: Billy Porter
Date posted: Dec 15, 2021
darkoshi: (Default)
Because I like my clothing to be loose, I often end up with shirts that are very wide on the torso. Sometimes that bothers me when I look in the mirror, because the shirt, which may otherwise look awesome, sticks out in back or puffs up in the middle, making it look less good.

One quick fix is to use safety pins to pinch in the left and right sides a few inches up from the bottom of the shirt.

Another thing I've done is to sew a short inside seam on the left and right sides, angling inwards towards the bottom. That keeps it from billowing out on the bottom. But then the shirt may still be too wide and puffy on the top.

A better option may be to turn the shirt inside out and sew new seams for the entire left and right sides a few inches inward from the original seams. Extend the original sleeve-seam inwards a few inches, and then curve downwards for the new side seam. The problem I've had with this in the past, is that when the shirt is turned right-side out again, the fabric bunches up at the sleeve-to-side seam. That happened even if I cut off most of the excess fabric. The following page explains how to prevent the fabric from bunching up.

Sewing Tips – Clipping Corners and Curves.

The only difficulty then is how to sew the edges of the seam to prevent fraying, after having clipped the edges. I've been doing it by hand-sewing those parts, and sewing around the clipped edges, in and out, so that the new line of thread doesn't make it bunch up again.

So far, I've done that for 3 shirts.

I also hand-sewed belt-loops onto one pair of pants, and started sewing them onto another. Having a belt feels much more comfortable and convenient to me, than having only elastic or a drawstring at the waist. And I can clip things like my keys to the belt or to the loops.
darkoshi: (Default)
...when people turn off their porch lights. Even on a Sunday, the day before, even though around here trick or treating is even less likely to occur on a Sunday than on other days of the week.

I wonder what percentage of households still put out decorations and give out candy. I think it must be very very low. So low that the radio commercial that played twice this evening seems incongruous to me. A female speaker was saying "You don't want to be one of *those* houses where they run out of candy and start handing out pennies".

Not that I've been driving around looking, but I've only seen 2 houses with decorations this year, other than mine (and mine doesn't have much, just some lights and such). One of those 2 houses I only saw because my mom mentioned it to me, and when I drove by this evening, the lights weren't on. Most likely to discourage anyone from thinking they were giving out candy today instead of tomorrow.

I can't imagine anyone in this day and age, young or old, would knock on some stranger's door to trick or treat, just because it has a porch light on, with no decorations up. It's rare enough to get trick-or-treaters at my house, even with Halloween lights up. Surely this turning off of porch lights is just something ingrained in people of an older generation who grew up when trick or treating was more common...

But according to a survey last year, 78% of households were giving out candy. WHAT????!!!! The actual survey results say 78% of *parents*, not all households. But still, that sounds awfully high to me. Is it only in the South that neighborhood trick or treating is so low? I have no actual childhood experience with trick or treating in residential neighborhoods like where I live now. As a kid, I only ever trick or treated in military housing areas.

Here's another list of Halloween survey results, from 2013 and 2014.
61 percent of the American public will decorate their front porch or door to welcome trick-or-treaters (69 percent of households with children will do so).
WHAT???!!!
76 percent of households plan to hand out candy to trick-or-treaters this year.
So... that means that 15% of households that plan to give out candy may do it without any decorations after all? Or maybe they simply do it at an alternate location like a school or church.

Anyway. I've got my outfit for tomorrow figured out. I won't wear the vest actually, as it is way too warm for that.



(Ha! Finally found an opportunity to wear my impractical clothes out in public.)
(Hey, if you look closely, you can see my pink-bow-wearing spider hovering in the background.)
darkoshi: (Default)
This was my 3rd time being called in for jury duty, but the first time I was actually picked to sit on a jury. The experience was very interesting.

It was a lawsuit; I was glad it wasn't a criminal case. The trial took 3 days. We went home in the evenings. The first day, we were allowed to leave the courthouse for lunch. The next 2 days, lunch was ordered for us and we weren't allowed out.

I noticed very quickly that the demeanor and style of one of the lawyers appealed to me, and that of the other lawyer was off-putting. I did my best to ignore both feelings, and to pay unbiased attention to the proceedings. The judge seemed laid back and slightly amused, as if he'd been through thousands of similar cases. The lawyers were all obviously trying to do a good job for their clients, and I felt a bit sorry that one side or another would have to lose.

There were 12 jurors and 2 alternates. Of the total, only 2 were men.

We were instructed not to discuss the case with anyone, not even the other jurors, until all the testimony was finished. There was a jury room where we gathered in the mornings, and where we had to go each time the lawyers wanted to discuss/dispute something with the judge during the trial. We'd go into the court room, sit down, listen for a while, then have to get up, go to the jury room to wait, then return to the court room and sit down again. Repeat, repeat, repeat. I didn't count how many times.

At one point, the "cool" lawyer did a nifty thing with his glasses. He had pushed them up on his forehead while shuffling through papers, and then did a quick head movement that snapped the glasses down in place again. I'm not sure if it happened by accident, or if it was a practiced skill.

During the closing arguments, the lawyer who didn't appeal to me made religious references 3 times. First, he picked up the bible which had been used to swear in the witnesses, and talked about some particular moral story in there. I raised my eyebrow at that. Really? Later he mentioned a preacher. At the end, he picked up the bible again, and reminded us of that story again. When the other lawyer gave his rebuttal, he basically said that he didn't care about some story from 2000 years ago (that surprised me too), that we should consider the facts of this case.

I didn't realize it at the time, but a feeling of camaraderie was growing in me in regards to the other jurors and even the court officials. During those many trips to the jury room, as we weren't allowed to discuss the case, the other jurors would chat. One lady especially, told several entertaining stories about her life. When we were finally allowed to debate the case, it was an amicable process, even though voices got loud as opinions were shared. Our decision had to be unanimous, and we eventually came to one.

Back in the courtroom, the foreman handed off our written decision to the judge. The judge flipped through the pages and stared at the last page for a long time. I began to worry that we'd done something wrong; that the judge would declare a mistrial. But he finally handed the sheets to the clerk, who read out the decision, and then it was over.

At the end, I realized that I'd likely never see these people again, and even if I did, I'd probably not recognize them or remember where I knew them from. It made me feel slightly sad. People with whom you've shared a special experience as well as minor hardships. Having to report for duty each day, with the threat of officers coming after you, if you didn't make it there on time. Having to spend time in a small room together. Having to sit quietly in court, paying close attention to everything. Having to tuck* my shirt tail in.

In the hours and days afterward, I wondered if we'd made the right decision. It seemed like we had, based on what was presented to us. But what about the things that hadn't been presented? What about the things we were sent out of the court room, not to hear? The trial being over, I finally did some internet searches to find more information on the case. I found a little, but not much. (Actually, it surprised me that the judge never told us not to do any internet searches before the trial was over - unless he did and I somehow missed it. But I assumed that we shouldn't, and therefore didn't.)

*The first morning, as I was following other potential jurors into the courtroom, a bailiff waved a few guys including me to the side, telling us to tuck our shirt tails in. At first I didn't understand what he had said, but he was also pointing to a sign on the wall which said the same thing. My first reaction was to frown in annoyance, but I went ahead and did it. Maybe the bailiff mistook me for a man, but if the other guys had to do it, it seemed reasonable for me to have to do so as well. Every day after that, I was careful to remember to tuck my shirt in, in the morning. This entailed choosing a shirt which would actually look good tucked in, of which I only have a few. The others are wider and billow at my waist and look ridiculous to me when I tuck them in. But I've just now found this page, which explains the "military tuck" which I'll have to try out.

lamp mystery solved

Tuesday, October 1st, 2013 09:56 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
This regards the lamp that I nearly electrocuted myself on (though Qiao, having more experience with such things, thinks it unlikely that I would have gotten more than a nasty shock).

After taking the lamp apart to replace the socket, I discovered that the socket didn't actually have a contact missing, and it wasn't actually intended to take a 3-way light bulb. The socket does have a 3rd terminal, but it's not for controlling the extra filament of a 3-way bulb as I expected.

The old socket has 3 screw terminals, whereas the replacement 3-way socket I bought has only 2. Four wires come up out of the base of the lamp, and 2 wires were connected to one of the 3 screws.

It turns out there is actually a little bulb in the base of the lamp, which Qiao and I never knew about! The base is ceramic, with a lot of cut-outs in a nice pattern. The inside of the base had a paper lining, hiding the stuff inside. Inside that, there was a little Christmas tree type bulb, which must have burned out long ago. Turning the knob once would turn on the little light in the base, twice would turn on the top light, and thrice would turn on both.

Not sure what I'm going to do with it now. I think it would look neat to replace the little bulb with a short string of white LEDs, but I'll have to figure a way of hooking that up.



(Nearly every time I take a photo in the above room, I'm chagrined to later discover a roll of toilet paper in the picture. I use it for blowing my nose, as it has a higher recycled paper content than facial tissue. It even managed to sneak itself into the above photo.)


I love how these socks look together with these shoes! (Kudos to you if you can figure out how this photo was taken).

coltsfoot

Tuesday, August 27th, 2013 11:59 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
Random thought yesterday: The glitter is going to wear off more in the front than the back. So not only will (this belt) be deglittered, but it'll be deglittered unevenly.

.

My personal allergy season is starting.

I had written down "sweet coltsfoot" on a to-order/to-buy list early this year. Never got around to it. I can't remember if it was in relation to allergies, or post-nasal drip / cough, or headaches.

Another important distinction:

Coltsfoot (Tussilago farfara) versus Sweet Coltsfoot (Petasites *; also known as Butterbur).

Both naturally contain pyrrolizidine alkaloids, which can damage the liver. So it is advised to get products certified PA-free.


The name "tussilago" itself means "cough suppressant".
...
Butterbur root extracts have been reported to be effective in reducing frequency and severity of migraine headaches.
...
a study showed Butterbur extract to be an effective treatment for hay fever without the sedative effect


Treating Seasonal Allergies the Old School Indian Way..Revisited
darkoshi: (Default)
It continues to delight me, seeing so many colorful athletic shoes now available and marketed towards both men and women, both boys and girls. Sometimes it isn't even immediately obvious which gender they are intended for.

A K-mart ad has a kids' shoe decorated with a cartoon skull bedecked with a pink bow. Based on the colors, it is marketed towards girls. Till now, I've only seen skull emblems on boys' clothing. Personally, I don't care for skulls and death symbols, but it's interesting to see this kind of gender cross-over in fashion... Ah, the pink bow skull emblem is from Monster High. I suppose it isn't really cross-over then... a marketing distinction still remains, of things for girls being made to look cute, and things for boys being made to look ominous / dangerous.

At Kohl's, I found an awesome pair of shoes with orange and turquoise highlights, non-leather and made by Asics.

Kohl's also impressed me with colorful dress socks in the men's section. There were bright red ones, pink ones, and several multi-colored patterned ones. Bright neon-colored athletic socks also caught my eye. I don't think men's socks would fit me well though. Besides the foot size being larger, they tend to go partway up the calf, and I don't really understand what keeps them from falling down, compared to knee-socks where the top elastic is above the calf.

darkoshi: (Default)
I found out that some men's dress pants have extra fabric purposely put into the back seam, so that the waist can be easily altered wider. How cool is that? Why don't they do that with women's pants too? But I can't complain too much on that point, as actually only some men's dress pants have this feature, and it seems that khakis and jeans never do. I found only 2 pants in the house with the feature, and ironically they're mine, not Qiao's.

Boy's pants or shorts often have elastic strips with button holes sewn into the inside of the waistband. This is a nifty feature too. But the buttons they attach to tend to dig into the skin on my hips and make me itch, so it's not super nifty.
darkoshi: (Default)
Me: Do these look ok together?
[brandishing a black/gray plaid shirt and a black/purple/white tie-dye pair of pants]

Qiao: hmm... Based on your standards, yes.

Me: :-/

the skirted duo

Friday, August 31st, 2012 03:35 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
This is a sweet story about a boy who likes wearing skirts and dresses, and what his father decided to do about it.

The original German version is here.

Excerpt from the end:
When other boys (it’s nearly always boys) want to make fun of him, he smiles and says, "You just don’t dare to wear skirts and dresses, because your dads don’t dare to either."

snazzy shoes

Friday, July 13th, 2012 04:40 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
August 1st, 2011:
If I found a pink silver purple glittery star and heart decorated pair of shoes, in my size, which were comfortable and had good arch support, and didn't have leather or PVC, I would totally get them. But alack, the star-studded glittery shoes are generally only to be found in little foot sizes, and without the other qualities.

November 13th, 2011:
but they still don't have any hot-pink sparkly athletic shoes in my size. Oh, well. Maybe someday they will.

..

July 2012:
Yes! Hot-pink, silver & black athletic shoes not containing leather, and in my size and comfortable! Found at K-Mart.

What is it about getting a pair of snazzy new shoes, that makes one feel supernatural? ... a mental crossing over into fantasy-land, where you can tip-tap-fly-away like Hermes with his winged sandals.









In the days after getting these shoes, I saw several random women wearing hot pink athletic shoes... The era of women's athletic shoes for the most part only being offered in white with pastel trim or in all-black seems to thankfully be ending.

conversation

Saturday, January 7th, 2012 12:33 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
Me: Shows Qiao photos of the Beautiful Rainbow shoes and points to one of them.

Qiao: "Naaah"

Me: Points to another pair.

Qiao: "Naaah."

Me: "But.... But you could see me wearing those shoes, right?"

Qiao: "Oh yeah, everyone who knows you could see you wearing those shoes."
darkoshi: (Default)
New Balance MR890RG




New Balance MR760ROB




New Balance MR870R


pockets

Friday, December 2nd, 2011 03:48 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
So, there I was, exploring what Sears had to offer, and some nicely colored/patterned fleece pajama pants caught my eye. I sauntered over, but was soon disappointed by discovering that they didn't have any pockets. A quick inspection of all the other pajama pants in that section showed that none of them had pockets. Humm, I thought, that sucks... maybe pajama pants aren't ever made with pockets... I guess sleeping people don't usually need to store things on their person... although it sure is handy to have some tissues in one's pocket, for blowing one's nose...

I've been wearing sweatpants as a substitute for so long, that I don't remember whether pajamas normally have pockets or not. One of my sweatpants doesn't have pockets either, which plays into my determination to only consider new pajama pants if they *do* have pockets. On the weekends, I'll often wear my "pajama" sweatpants for a good portion of the morning/day, so it's useful for them to have pockets to put keys and other things in.

Then I walked through the men's section, and saw some more pajama pants, so decided to take a look. Guess what? They all had pockets! Apparently it's only the women's pajama pants that don't have pockets. The men's pajama pants weren't pretty though.

waves

Tuesday, August 9th, 2011 11:28 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I drove to Myrtle Beach. The drive there was fine. The day was cloudy and there was some rain, so I did not get hot during the drive, in spite of my car not having air-conditioning.

My hotel room was fine. From some reviews of the hotel I had read, I had been a bit worried, but the room was fine. It had a fine view of the ocean.

I went to the ocean. I was wearing my new swim outfit, consisting of boys'/men's swim-shorts and a girls'/women's sleeveless rashguard. The outfit felt very comfortable. It's the first time I recall ever feeling comfortable, and not at all dorky, in a swimsuit. I even went wandering around the hotel grounds in the outfit afterwards, rather than going to my room right away to change out of it.

The ocean was fine. It wasn't cold. It was salty, but that is to be expected of the ocean. I didn't encounter any garbage nor any sharks nor any stinging jellyfish in the water. There were nice waves.

Me being in the ocean consists of wading out in the water to chest-height, watching for tall waves in order to jump with them and avoid my face getting wet, doggy-paddling a bit, floating on my back a bit, and as I mentioned, watching out for waves. It's sort of a game, me against the ocean. Of course, the ocean would always win against me, so I only go out chest-deep, enough to be somewhat dangerous but not muchly so. Even then the ocean tends to win. It did on the 2nd day, smacking me down with a big wave, and then pummeling me with another. I excused myself from the game in order to expel stinging saltwater from my airways. Not to leave on a defeated note, I then went back into the surf and waded knee-deep for a while.

Then I even went into one of the swimming pools for a while. I hadn't been in a swimming pool for over a decade or so. (There's something unappealing about getting into a tank of chlorine-smelling water in which other people have been hanging around in). I doggy paddled a bit, and swam a bit, and floated on my back. It was ok. Nothing particularly special. I determined that I hadn't been missing much in that decade or so. But it was ok.

I was glad for my new swim outfit, which I felt comfortable in. I was glad for my menstrual cup, which made going into the water possible, in spite of my period having started the day of the trip.

Seeing the laser lights at night was neat, even though I worried about the beams catching me in my eyes.

I went out to eat with my family. It was ok.

I thought about what it would be like, to be down at the ocean without other people around, so that I could listen to the ocean talking without any distractions... I realized that it would either not make any impact on me at all (no different than having people around), or that I would feel sadness.

Internet access was sporadic at the hotel, as was my cell-phone signal.
I flipped through the channels on the cable television in my room. I watched part of a movie.

The next day I went shopping and bought some things. That was fine.

Then I drove back home. The temperature was in the 100s that day, and it was a hot drive back. But it was ok. I drove through Sumter, to see the town. There wasn't much special to see though, on the route I took. I also stopped at a boat landing by the Wateree River. It was sort of neat down there... I would have liked to just sit on the landing for a while, watching the river flow past. But I was the only person there, and I had left my car windows rolled down, and I felt a bit uneasy that someone might walk out of the bushes and/or steal from my car while it was out of my sight.

I managed to avoid a sun-burn while at the ocean. My left arm nearly got sunburned on the drive back. But so far it's ok and not peeling.

Forestfen called and asked me if my extra day at the beach was "wonderful". (She left the day before me). I said that it was ok. I don't think she really heard my answer, but I don't mind. It's easier if she thinks I'm happy. Sometimes I wonder to myself, is she for real? Does she really experience things which seem plain or okay or fine to me as "wonderful"? Do other people experience things like she does?

swimwear

Monday, August 1st, 2011 12:16 am
darkoshi: (Default)
I like a lot of masculine and boyish fashion styles. But I also like cute feminine things sometimes. If I found a pink silver purple glittery star and heart decorated pair of shoes, in my size, which were comfortable and had good arch support, and didn't have leather or PVC, I would totally get them. But alack, the star-studded glittery shoes are generally only to be found in little foot sizes, and without the other qualities.

One common motif in boy's clothing which I don't like for myself, is skulls. I also don't care for sports motifs, or car/truck/motorcycle motifs... oh well. But it's generally easier for me to find things I like in the boys'/men's departments, than in the women's. (Girls' sizes don't fit me, otherwise there'd probably be a few more pink/glittery/star-studded items in my closet).

.

I'm going to the beach next weekend, so I've been looking for some new swimwear. I bought a couple of boy's/men's swimming trunks aka boardshorts. I don't like the feel of water swirling directly across my nether regions, so I also looked for some women's swim bottoms to wear underneath the shorts. It was hard to find any that met with my approval. Most of the bikini bottoms I saw aren't even big enough to cover my butt crack (and I have a small butt!). The few I tried on made me painfully aware of how much cellulite I have on my legs. But I did find 2 pairs which seemed ok (the first store didn't have any good ones, the 2nd store had 1 good one, and the 3rd store had 1 good one).

I didn't find any tops in the stores which met with my approval. But I hadn't expected to, so I had already ordered these fine-looking items:
Girls4Sport Sleeveless Black Rashguard
Girls4Sport Forever Sleeveless Rashguard (I suspect that photo isn't quite correct, since the style is different than the first link. But either style is ok with me.)

I have a green sports-bra, which I suppose I could wear as a top too... with or without a t-shirt over it. It would match the board-shorts I bought, color-wise.

No Bikini

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010 10:58 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I like this short film.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dyQP_nuhQ1Q

.

It's been striking me lately, the contradiction between the concurrent messages put forth by society about breasts... that they are beautiful, and that most people really like having them or looking at them or touching them, while at the same time that they are obscene and porn-ful and indecent and slutty, and must be covered up and hidden.
It also seems ironic that babies are allowed to look at them and suck on them, but that older children must be "protected" from the sight of them.

randomness

Sunday, November 22nd, 2009 05:39 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
After/while getting over my anger/crying fit yesterday from having had the puppy disrespect me, I stayed up late recaulking part of my tub, and ironing all the wrinkled clothes that had accumulated in my closet over the past few months. Went to bed at 3:40am. Was woken up by a phone call from Forestfen, at 1pm today. I haven't managed to sleep so well after going to bed so late, in a looooong time. If the phone hadn't rung, I might have even slept longer. Then I had to get up in order to let the puppy out of the garage. I felt groggy for quite a while.

.

Doing a puzzle, I didn't recognize that "loll" was a real word. I've become so familiar with the term "LOL", that it has overlaid my familiarity with the word "loll", even though in the beginning, the term "LOL" invoked associations in my mind with "loll" (reading and pronouncing LOL as "loll" in my head invoked mental images of tongues hanging out of mouths and of people idling/lollygagging around, as opposed to laughing).

.

I bought a fancy shirt and pair of pants at JC Penney because they appealed to me, even though I realized that they were too impractical to wear anywhere. The pants are a black shiny, silky, clingy polyester material, with cargo-pants-style side pockets, glittery crystal buttons, a golden chain belt, and leg-cuffs that tie up around the ankles with cords. The shirt is also black, made out of 2 thin shear fabrics and with small front pockets. Wearing a black sports-bra, one can see the shape of the bra through the thin fabric. The pants and shirt make me feel sexy. But I'm not in the habit of going anywhere where it would be appropriate to wear clothing like that. And even if I were, I'd worry about being cold there, if I did wear them. I need to sew some elastic into the pants' waistband. It's size 5 (!). All the sizes, even down to size 2 (!!!) were too wide on my hips, but I chose the size 5 because the others were too tight on my legs. Women's pants styles seem so weird to me. For other type pants, I usually need a size 8 at least for them not to be too tight on my waist. But with the kind which are supposed to ride low on the hips, the waist is always way too large for me, and the legs way too skinny. And the pockets!; most women's pants if they have any pockets at all have *tiny* pockets!

.

I am going to start looking up at the sky or ceiling whenever Zorro bites on my feet or pants-legs. That's supposed to discourage puppies, since they want your attention and to play. It was working when I tried it earlier today. But then she got hold of the cord from my jacket and kept pulling on it, until I worried it was going to break and rescued it. Seriously... she already tore a big hole in a pair of Q's good trousers, and tore a small hole in my pajama pants, and tore the end off one of my shoelaces. I've been trying not to wear my good clothes and shoes much lately, because I worry that she'll ruin them.

.

Oh! And I found a connection where I wasn't expecting it, while surfing/browsing friends' profiles and pages. Darkoshi (SC, USA) is friends with [livejournal.com profile] goliath20031977 (SC, USA) who is friends with [livejournal.com profile] carreanne_s_c (Michigan, USA), on one of whose journal entries [livejournal.com profile] sttatus_quo (Dallas, USA) commented (and I thought, ::my, that user-name looks familiar::), who is friends with [livejournal.com profile] andrewducker (Scotland), who is friends with Darkoshi.

(no subject)

Saturday, July 4th, 2009 09:58 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
On the way to a 4th of July picnic at the lake, the topic of conversation turned to the strange fashion statement some people make, wearing their pants down at their knees, or below their butts, as if to show off their underwear. (Or maybe it is to show off their nicely proportioned buttocks?)

At the lake, it was crowded, sunny, warm, and noisy. After a while, I noticed an aesthetically pleasing-looking person... dressed in a red/black patterned shirt similar to one of mine, with black pants with a silvery chain on one side, and a glittery logo on the other, and a dapper hat... and, to my pleasant surprise, they appeared to be physically female, based on their chest. But they were definitely dressed in a masculine style. Hmmm, someone sort of like me... cool.

But she/he had zir pants hanging low in back, like the people we had been talking about on the ride there :)
Only partway down the butt, and it didn't really look bad, but still amusing.

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
1819 2021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Thursday, May 22nd, 2025 07:43 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios