nonsensical lyrics

Tuesday, January 23rd, 2018 09:54 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
Driving home, the Peter Gabriel song "Sledgehammer" came on the radio. I suppose the lyrics have always seemed nonsensical to me, but it's a nice catchy song to mentally sing along to. But today the thought struck me, "Wait a minute. This doesn't make sense. What is this song really about?"

When I hear the word "sledgehammer", I think of one of those big heavy things they have at fairs, which you heave up in the air and smash down with all your force against a target, to make the whatchamacallit go up, and if hits the bell at the top, you get a prize. It also makes me think of Tom and Jerry cartoons, where Tom runs after Jerry with the sledgehammer, trying to smash Jerry on the head. Or maybe that was some other cartoon.

So, I interpret the lyrics to this song - "I wanna be your sledgehammer" as "I want to smash this big heavy object down on your head and kill you". Or maybe as, "I'll do that to other people for you". But neither of those really make sense in terms of the rest of the song.

Then it occurred to me that a sledgehammer wasn't what I was thinking it was. Wasn't it one of those things construction workers use, to break up the asphalt, those things that go up and down, bang bang bang against the ground? (After looking up the words up now, I realized that is a jackhammer, not a sledgehammer. My original idea of a sledgehammer was correct.)

But anyway, thinking of a jackhammer, I suddenly realized the song must be about sex. Ohhhhhhhhh. Sledgehammer, as in I want to fuck you. With that realization, came disappointment. Another fun old childhood song turning out to be about sex. Now it won't feel the same, singing along to it. Unless I forget tonight's line of thought, which may happen. A sledgehammer as a phallic symbol still really doesn't make sense to me. People don't smash other people on the heads with giant phalluses.

aversions

Monday, September 29th, 2014 07:46 am
darkoshi: (Default)
(I'm splitting my prior post into 2 separate ones, in order to expand on a subject.)

My impression of the Transparent pilot:
I'm intrigued by 2 of the main characters (Maura & Ali), and somewhat put off by the other 2. I was quite put off by the sex scenes, and by the many shots of bare breasts, and squeezing of breasts. The bathroom scene showing bare female buttocks didn't bother me but together with all the rest, the show seems like it was scripted to attract viewers who like female nudity and sex scenes. So while I'm intrigued by part of the story, I'm also put off by a lot of it.

.

Not liking the nudity and sex scenes probably makes me sound like a prude. Maybe I am? But I don't think that movies/films/books shouldn't be allowed to have scenes like those; I just don't personally like them.

Why don't I like them? What is it about them that so puts me off? It's not just any sex scenes, or any nudity that puts me off. Only certain kinds. (Although most explicit mainstream sex scenes would fall into that category, which is why I don't watch porn.)

Take the show "Gray's Anatomy". Its characters were having sex or talking about sex and relationships all the time, but those scenes didn't bother me much (beyond rolling my eyes and thinking "there they go at it again!"). But most of those scenes weren't very explicit and didn't involve nudity.

I suspect that what I feel is similar to the aversion that some hetero people feel when watching explicit gay scenes. But what exactly is it that turns me off, and why?

Light spoilers follow )

oh she's good

Wednesday, May 9th, 2012 11:44 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
This made me laugh a lot in several places.


Video title: Why woman are different from men and vice versa By Amanda Gore
Posted by: Amanda Gore TV
URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sbF-4LOOC5c
darkoshi: (Default)
Being mostly asexual, I've always had a hard time understanding what sex has to do with love; about why having sex purportedly tends to make sexual people start feeling love and/or affection for the person(s) they have sex with. Or why it increases the love/affection they feel for the other person.

But it occurred to me this morning that sex is generally very pleasurable for sexual people, and that the person they have sex with therefore becomes a source of pleasure for them. And when someone is a source of pleasure for you, you start to like them a lot. The greater the pleasure, the more you like them.

In retrospect, it seems quite obvious, but I'm not sure if it's ever quite "clicked" in my mind that way before... I would think of 2 people having sex, and I'd consider the physical act of sex itself the source of pleasure for the people involved, and I didn't see why the physical act would lead to an emotional bond, since it was a purely physical act.

It's been such a rare occurrence for anyone in real life to be a great source of pleasure for me, that it's almost a foreign concept to me. It's even been rare for anyone to be a moderate source of pleasure; which may be why I've rarely felt much inclination to try to form and maintain friendships with people.

Maybe what I feel for Qiao is closer to friendship than love. I'm still not sure if I really love anyone. Qiao has on occasion been a great source of pleasure for me, but that's mostly been long in the past. Nowadays he is usually a moderate source of pleasure for me.

Those times when someone has been a great source of pleasure to me, it has felt sexual to me... that is how I've come to define sexuality in my mind, even if it may not actually be related to sex. Great pleasure is *sexual*; it is a sudden magical *thing* between that person and me, which sparks my mind and excites my emotions and possibly also excites my body. During those moments, I adore the other person. And for a long time afterwards, I remember the pleasure that was felt, prolonging the pleasure, and I still associate it with the other person, and I therefore still adore the other person. This persists for a long time until the person ceases being a continuing source of great pleasure, and I no longer expect or hope to feel it from them again.

(no subject)

Saturday, June 27th, 2009 06:07 pm
darkoshi: (Default)

a brief mental dalliance
with my elusive master
and trickster god
apprentice... no?... servant...
sex
hmph
that's all it devolves into
because creativity fails me.
yet, a brief dalliance
is better than none
at all
and it has been a while
since the elusive one
has visited my mind.

no sex in 2 weeks.
odd to think
that for 2 years...

yet maybe it is the lack of sex
that enables my mind
to create
a sexual fantasy
where the content
is somewhat enticing
as opposed to mundane.

(no subject)

Tuesday, March 24th, 2009 05:58 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I am reading "Atlas Shrugged", based on Qiao's recommendation. He gave me the book after having re-read it himself recently. I can't say yet whether I much like the book or not, but it's quite more interesting and readable than I thought it would be.

I came across the first sex-scene in the book today. The sex was described as being wonderfully pleasurable for both people. It was described as being how joy was meant to be expressed. Or something like that.

98% of the world's adult population, or somewhere there abouts, feels that way about sex. That sex is this wonderful, pleasurable thing. And I am left staring at the words, thinking, who are these people? They are not me. I do not feel the things they feel. They are alien to me. I am out of place in this world...

Every time I see sexual content on TV or in a movie, it makes me feel alienated and alone.

Even Ugly Betty was trying to make out with her boyfriend in the episode last week, and she was upset when he kept dodging her attempts. But then they hashed it all out, and up to his apartment they went, apparently to have wonderful, pleasurable sex.

Fuck you, world.

(no subject)

Monday, March 16th, 2009 07:46 am
darkoshi: (Default)
I often try to comprehend what role sex plays in a relationship, for sexual people.

There are so many things which indicate that for most sexual men, a relationship without sex is unthinkable; that sex is the most important thing about a relationship to them. Which generally gives me the impression that they are only in a relationship in order to have sex. But a lot of the time, that doesn't seem quite true either.

Perhaps a relationship without sex is to them like a relationship without touch would be to me. I could get some things which I'd need from a relationship, without there being any physical touch, but that one lack would be a large one. I wouldn't choose such a relationship unless there was no chance at a relationship including touch. I would feel the lack of being able to hold hands, lean heads together, hug, etc. Being hugged, and being held, is important to me.

Any relationship just based on touch would not suffice for me - I'd have to be attracted to the other person in the first place, and there'd need to be a certain amount of compatibility. So even though touch is very important, it's not the only important thing, nor necessarily the most important thing.

(no subject)

Saturday, August 16th, 2008 03:16 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
The Bush administration wants to cut off federal aid from any organization that refuses to hire people who object to birth control, by redefining abortion to include drugs that prevent implantation such as the birth control pill and emergency contraception:

In the proposal, obtained by The New York Times, the administration says it could cut off federal aid to individuals or entities that discriminate against people who object to abortion on the basis of “religious beliefs or moral convictions.”

The proposal defines abortion as follows: “any of the various procedures — including the prescription, dispensing and administration of any drug or the performance of any procedure or any other action — that results in the termination of the life of a human being in utero between conception and natural birth, whether before or after implantation.”


I suppose the idea of life starting at conception is nothing new, and Bush doing things to restrict access to not only abortion but also birth control is nothing new either. But when I think of people who are against birth control, I generally think of Catholics, and having non-Catholics espousing the same ideas still surprises me at times.

It's enough to make me want to forswear having sex on my own moral grounds. If people think that because I have sex, I should be forced to endure pregnancy and having children... I don't fucking need to be having sex. I'm just doing it to make other people happy anyway. If the bloody people I have sex with support politicians who espouse those kind of ideas... it fucking goes against my morals to be sexually involved with them.

I am asexual.

Friday, May 2nd, 2008 09:31 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
I am asexual. That's something I used to know, but which I came to be unsure of for the last several years. But it is true. Asexuality can take different forms, but I just read a definition again which fits me quite well: I do not have a need for sex.

I do not have a sex drive. I have no desire for sex. I have been fine without it, and would be fine without ever having it again. All else equal, I would probably prefer to not ever have sex again. I do on a rare occasion experience sexual arousal, which feels great, but even that does not make me "need" or desire sex. I feel horny more often than I feel arousal, and I masturbate when I feel horny. I get more physical satisfaction from masturbation than from sex - I get little physical pleasure from sex itself. I have to be in a certain head-space in order for someone else touching me to even feel erotic, and that head-space is not easy to come by.

I do not experience sexual attraction in the common sense. When I do, on rare occasions, feel what might be considered sexual attraction, or a sexual response to someone, it is not based on their appearance so much as on their attitude and mannerisms in how they interact with me. When I do feel such an attraction, it is a good feeling, but not something that makes me want to have sex with the person.

I like hugging and cuddling and physical touch, but sex itself is messy, time-consuming, rather boring, and only enjoyable insofar as I feel good that the other person feels good. In the beginning, it was somewhat erotic and enjoyable because I was able to get into a certain head-space with it, but that has faded. Even if I were able to get my head-space back, it would be more enjoyable for me without the sex. Not that I wouldn't want any physicality - I would - but I just don't desire the physical act of sex.

interesting

Sunday, January 13th, 2008 01:46 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
Chemical Castration: Freedom From The Madness Of Passion
"Most of us guys spend the majority of our day in a state of cognizable horniness. It's not oppressive, but it's there, like a low level buzzing, sometimes out-of-mind, but never completely. The only silence in our lives is immediately after orgasm in what is known as the refractory period. Mostly, women fail to understand this. They don't experience this buzzing in the same way and believe men exercise a degree of choice in their sexual urges. But we really are slaves to our dicks and our only emancipation from this incessant horniness is through sex, or masturbation. In a way our sexual behavior is an expression of our need to rid ourselves, if only for a few minutes, of the incessant buzzing."

Zestra

Sunday, August 19th, 2007 10:33 am
darkoshi: (Default)
I tried out the Zestra.

The only effect it seemed to have on me was to produce a warming/heat sensation in the genitals. It did not arouse me mentally, or make me feel significantly different physically, or make it easier to orgasm (somewhat hard to gauge, since the preparations for doing this put me into a state where I orgasmed fairly quickly anyway). It did not make my orgasms feel any stronger or better than usual. It did not cause insertion of a dildo* into my vagina to feel any better than usual.

(* - how quaint; LiveJournal's spell-checker doesn't recognize "dildo" as a real word. And for that matter, it doesn't recognize "LiveJournal" either.)

Despite the website saying that Zestra is not flavored and not the best-tasting choice for oral sex, it did have a good scent and did not taste bad... it is simply an unflavored oil with hardly any taste at all. It did make my tongue tingle a little bit. I put some on my lips too, but it did not produce any sensation there.

I haven't tried any other heat-sensation producing products like the ones containing capsicum, so I can't give a comparison of this to those.

.

I wish I knew what it feels like to experience a whole-body orgasm with the "fireworks" and contracting muscles bit. I wonder if I will ever experience that. It seems doubtful, since my body has never done that so far.

I think I'd probably gain more pleasure from having a good in-depth mental fantasy again like the ones I used to have, over any physical orgasm, no matter how strong. I wonder whether I will ever have any fantasies like those again.

It seems like I've heard that many females never experience orgasms, but I haven't heard as much about females who experience only "weak" orgasms like mine. I wonder how common or uncommon it is to only have the physical sensations which I have. And I wonder if males experience orgasms along a continuum from weak to strong too; in other words if some guys only experience weak orgasms (or none at all), while some guys only experience strong ones.

(no subject)

Saturday, October 21st, 2006 12:32 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
There's something odd about my emotional and/or mental associations and disassociations between "arousal", "sex" and "being cared about" (ie. perhaps "love").

I think that when I feel sexual arousal in response to interactions with someone, I am likely to start feeling intense emotions for them... I start "caring about" them. And I may start feeling that the other person "cares about" me. Ie., I may start feeling that there is some kind of desirable connection between us, some kind of "love". This is probably similar to how other people respond to sexual arousal from interactions with someone else.

But sexual acts themselves... as other people think of sexual acts... seem to often have an opposite or partially conflicting effect on me. Perhaps because these sexual acts by themselves are generally not directly arousing for me? When we start engaging in those kinds of sexual interactions, I feel that the other person doesn't really care about me. I feel or think that they just enjoy being aroused, and our interactions provide the arousal, and I'm just a means to an end. Therefore they don't really care about me, but rather themselves. Yet the other person, in this scenario, is probably just like me... the things that arouse them make them feel cared about, and make them care for the other person.

Maybe I wouldn't have this problem, if the things that were arousing to the other person were the same things that were arousing to me. Maybe it's just that I am still turned off by certain things, for whatever reasons. And I can't feel good about the other person when our interactions make me feel turned off, even if some of our other interactions make me feel turned on. Maybe the connection/love/care I feel is directly related to how turned on I am versus how turned off I am. In other words, it is a very sexual thing, in spite of my mind somehow correlating sexual activity with the other person not caring about me.

Of course, there are also non-sexual factors involved.

EC

Sunday, September 24th, 2006 07:29 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
Yonmei had linked to this post where someone wrote about the difficulty they had in getting emergency contraception pills after a condom broke while she and her partner were having sex. This, in spite of the EC pills ("Plan B") having recently been approved by the FDA for over-the-counter sales.

When I first read the post, it quite disturbed me to realize how difficult it is in some places, not only to get an abortion, but simply to get emergency contraception to prevent pregnancy in the first place. I decided that I should call up local pharmacies and find out which ones have EC in stock and are willing to dispense it, without a lot of hassle, to people who need it. Even though I've had my tubes occluded and therefore do not personally foresee a need to ever obtain EC, I want to support those places that do dispense it, by shopping there instead of at places that do not. I'm also going to start supporting Planned Parenthood by including them in the groups I donate money to.

The person who wrote the original post also later wrote about some of the positive and negative comments she had received... here and here. I'm glad that the supportive comments far outweighed the negative ones, but some points stuck out to me:

- A lot of people seem to think it is a simple and inexpensive matter for a woman to get a tubal ligation or for a man to get a vasectomy. Last year, I had my tubes occluded via Essure, a non-surgical (no incisions or cutting involved) alternative to lubal ligation. Even though I have health insurance, which paid for most of the costs, I still ended up having to pay over $2,000 out-of-pocket.

- It really bothers me when people use gender-specific slurs such as "whore", "slut", and "bitch". It bothers me first of all that they are using a gender-specific slur... as if someone deserves a certain insult simply for being a certain gender... and it bothers me even more that, for most of these slurs, there isn't even a corresponding term for someone of the other sex. "Jerk" or "asshole" could be considered male versions of "bitch", but they still don't have exactly the same connotations as "bitch" does. As for "whore" and "slut"...? I can't think of any male version of those slurs at all. It's always only females who are so denigrated for having sex.

- Reading some of the negative comments which say the person shouldn't have been having sex if they didn't want to have a baby... if those comments were directed at me, I would feel like saying "Fuck it all. I'm NOT going to have sex anymore." Because frankly, I don't really give a damn about sex. It seems like it's mainly guys who care so much about sex anyway. In fact, I'm still not sure that the guys who've been interested in me so far haven't really only been interested in me for sex. Now, I'm not condemning them for that... after all my own interest in finding a partner isn't completely unsexual... but I could live fine without actual penis-in-vagina sex.

- One commenter wrote: "You see we were all once a fetus. Is it beyond the realm of possibilities that when your mother first learned she was carrying you, she may have considered her options? What if she had decided to terminate? Would that have been OK?

You would not exist, if you have children they would not exist, and your (husband or wife) would be married to someone else. You would have been deprived of all your experiences and memories. "


Am I so unusual, in that the thought of my mother having aborted me before I was born does not bother me? So what, if she had had an abortion? So what, if I didn't exist? Is this life so wonderful, that it would be such a horrible thing, if I wasn't born to live it? Personally, my answer to that is No, I wouldn't mind not being alive. In fact, I might have prefered being aborted. But regardless of that, I also have a semi-religious belief that, if I was truly meant to exist and to live this life, that it wouldn't have mattered if my potential mother had had an abortion. I would have just been born at another time, or to someone else.

- This issue has even more relevance to me right now, because a couple weeks ago, while I was having sex, the condom came off. If I hadn't had my tubes occluded, I could potentially now be pregnant. Admittedly, I personally wouldn't have risked having sex even with a condom, without a backup form of birth-control, but still - BC methods do fail.
BTW, the type of condom I was using was this non-latex one (its website is here). I was curious about how different it would be from the latex ones I've tried, but I definitely DO NOT recommend this brand. Not only did it come off, but the lubricant on it has a nasty smell and taste which is not at all suitable for even oral sex.

(no subject)

Monday, December 26th, 2005 12:00 am
darkoshi: (Default)
And as for kissing... open-mouthed kissing... One thing about it I didn't foresee, was that the other person's tongue would feel so cool, temperature-wise. I expected a tongue to be hot, or at least warm. As if having a warm squishy slimy thing thrust into your mouth isn't bad enough, but a cool squishy slimy thing?!!! It seems strange that people would consider that something erotic. And my poor dom, he only managed to get his tongue into my mouth one time so far... LOL... It must not be easy when the person you're trying to tongue-kiss starts laughing while your tongue is in their mouth.

(no subject)

Sunday, April 10th, 2005 10:35 am
darkoshi: (Default)
Hey, I've already met one more wonderful person. ... He seems nice, intelligent, and interesting, and he's a Dom. Although he lives somewhat farther away than would be convenient, and I'm not sure if we would be sexually compatible. But, cool. Who knows?

We were chatting about some things, and I realized that I'm currently in an in-between state... a state of uncertainty about what I want or don't want, at least sexually, in relationships with other people. Because I haven't had enough experience yet with doing sexual things with other people, to know if that is something I could enjoy at all, or not. If I were certain, I could just state from the outset that I was looking for someone who didn't want sex at all. Or I could state that I don't mind sex, but that it isn't at all enjoyable for me, by itself. Or if it turns out that I could enjoy sex, then it wouldn't be much of an issue. But as it is, I'm still not sure, and that makes me feel trepidation. And I'm really not going to be sure, until I actually try things out with people... with various people... until I have enough real experience to have such certainty.

wondering...

Sunday, January 30th, 2005 08:02 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
1. canvas sneakers.... they're not very waterproof, are they? and they don't usually have much arch-support, do they?

2. it sounds like you can't put a condom on an unerect penis... why? would it slip off because it would be too loose? or is it difficult to put on just because the penis isn't stiff?

3. safer sex.... when people talk about wanting "no exchange of bodily fluids", does that usually not include saliva? how safe or unsafe is open-mouthed kissing considered to be? what about oral sex? doing oral sex without a barrier is generally considered unsafe, isn't it?

As for that last question... I was reading a book in which the author, who seems to be relatively well-known and respected, was saying that except for monogamous heterosexual couples trying to procreate, everyone else should always use condoms while having sex, because due to the risk of diseases, there was "no reason to exchange bodily fluids". But then later he was talking about his partner doing some pretty good oral sex on him. And I wondered if he used a condom for that too, or not...

television, ooh, aah.

Saturday, July 10th, 2004 11:52 pm
darkoshi: (Default)
our big tv's at the repair shop again... so my mom bought an old small zenith black & white tv for $6... i hooked it up to our satellite box.

b&w... uhf & vhf... no remote control; crouching in front of the tv to change the (local) channels... rotary channel dials making that ratchety noise when you turn them... memories of days long gone.

something so old that still works; it's like magic.

.

I feel odd to be a 32 yr old still living with my mom. But she must be odd too, to not have wanted me to move out in all this time. For all I know, she's less interested in sex than I am. She used to very occasionally spend the night at her friend's house, so I thought, well maybe... even though she always made it sound like they only talked til late and then slept. But she doesn't even do that anymore.

sheez. i feel dorky for writing "my mom" so often in my entries.
maybe i'll call her by a name from now on instead... Forestfen, yep, that'll do.

July 2025

S M T W T F S
  1234 5
6 789101112
13 141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Monday, July 14th, 2025 02:13 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios